Indian J Pharm Close
 

Figure 2: Comparison of base reaction latency times between sham, sham-LA, and sham-LN groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 10 in each group). Repeated-measure ANOVA test showed that base reaction latency times in sham-LA group were signifi cantly lower than those of sham group (P < 0.001). However, in sham-LN group, it was nonsignifi cantly higher than that of sham group (P = 0.09)

Figure 2: Comparison of base reaction latency times between sham, sham-LA, and sham-LN groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (<i>n</i> = 10 in each group). Repeated-measure ANOVA test showed that base reaction latency times in sham-LA group were signifi cantly lower than those of sham group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). However, in sham-LN group, it was nonsignifi cantly higher than that of sham group (<i>P</i> = 0.09)