CORRESPONDENCE |
[Download PDF] |
|
| Year : 2004 | Volume
: 36
| Issue : 1 | Page : 45- |
Reply
B Gitanjali
IJP, JIPMER, Pondicherry, TN, India
Correspondence Address:
B Gitanjali
IJP, JIPMER, Pondicherry, TN
India
How to cite this article:
Gitanjali B. Reply.Indian J Pharmacol 2004;36:45-45
|
How to cite this URL:
Gitanjali B. Reply. Indian J Pharmacol [serial online] 2004 [cited 2023 May 28 ];36:45-45
Available from: https://www.ijp-online.com/text.asp?2004/36/1/45/6797 |
Full Text
The views expressed by Chauhan are very valid. These views hold good for pre and para clinical subjects too. Though I do not want to sound pessimistic, I am not sure whether a single letter would have sufficient impact to initiate changes in the list of equipment proscribed by the MCI. Many more such letters would probably be needed before we see a visible change.
|
