|LETTER TO THE EDITOR
|Year : 2012 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 279-280
Single dose cefazolin plus metronidazole versus existing multi-dose regimen for prophylaxis in caesarean section
Shraddha M Pore1, Suman P Sardesai2, Vinay S Tapare3, Meghana V Kulkarni1, Ankur P Malhotra1, Chandrashekhar S Chavan1
1 Department of Pharmacology, Dr. V.M. Government Medical College, Solapur, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shri Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Sarvopchar Rugnalaya, Solapur, Maharashtra, India
3 Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dr. V.M. Government Medical College, Solapur, Maharashtra, India
|Date of Web Publication||16-Mar-2012|
Shraddha M Pore
Department of Pharmacology, Dr. V.M. Government Medical College, Solapur, Maharashtra
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
|How to cite this article:|
Pore SM, Sardesai SP, Tapare VS, Kulkarni MV, Malhotra AP, Chavan CS. Single dose cefazolin plus metronidazole versus existing multi-dose regimen for prophylaxis in caesarean section. Indian J Pharmacol 2012;44:279-80
|How to cite this URL:|
Pore SM, Sardesai SP, Tapare VS, Kulkarni MV, Malhotra AP, Chavan CS. Single dose cefazolin plus metronidazole versus existing multi-dose regimen for prophylaxis in caesarean section. Indian J Pharmacol [serial online] 2012 [cited 2021 Aug 4];44:279-80. Available from: https://www.ijp-online.com/text.asp?2012/44/2/279/93874
The role of surgical chemoprophylaxis in caesarean section is well established,  but the recommendations about single-dose prophylaxis are not uniformly followed. Given the ever-increasing economic and health burden of caesarean deliveries in India  and the need for convenient and less costly regimens, this study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and estimate cost of prophylaxis with a single dose of cefazolin plus metronidazole and conventional multi-dose regimen for prophylaxis in caesarean section.
This prospective, open, randomized trial was conducted in our institution after approval by Institutional Ethics Committee. A total of 194 women with at least 28 weeks of gestation with singleton pregnancy undergoing caesarean delivery for various indications (during September-December 2006) were randomized after obtaining informed consent to receive either a single dose of cefazolin 1 g plus metronidazole 500 mg intravenously at cord clamping or ciprofloxacin 200 mg 12 hourly plus metronidazole 500 mg 8 hourly intravenously for the first 24 hours and, subsequently, ciprofloxacin 500 mg 12 hourly plus metronidazole 400 mg eight hourly, orally for the next six days. Women with a rupture of membranes for six or more hours, fever of 38°C or more at the time of caesarean section and suspected allergy to any of the study drugs were excluded.
Postoperative infectious morbidity in terms of wound infection, febrile morbidity, and endometritis was evaluated according to the method described by Pitt et al.  The total cost of antibiotic prophylaxis per patient was calculated by using the prices listed in IDR Triple I pharmacy compendium (Nov-Dec 2006). Statistical analysis was done by Chi-square test and Z test. P<0.05 was considered significant.
Two groups were comparable with respect to demographic and other baseline characteristics [Table 1]. Six percent of patients in the multi-dose group developed post-caesarean infectious morbidity as compared to four percent in the single-dose group [Table 2]. The most common infection was wound infection. One patient from the multi-dose group developed pelvic abscess-a complication of endometritis. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups with respect to postoperative infectious morbidity, length of hospital stay, or adverse drug effects. Only minor suspected adverse drug effects such as nausea, headache, and dizziness were reported by four percent of women in the multi-dose group and one percent of women in the single-dose group. Depending on the price of the cheapest and the most expensive brand, the range of approximate cost of antibiotic prophylaxis per patient for the single-dose group was Rs 50-100 and that for the multi-dose group was Rs 116-407.
The present study shows that prophylaxis with a single dose of cefazolin plus metronidazole is equivalent in efficacy to the week-long regimen of ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole in caesarean section, but it is 2-4 times less costly. Our findings are corroborated by previous studies, which show that metronidazole-containing regimens are as effective as week-long regimens, but come only at one-tenth of the cost. ,
| » References|| |
|1.||Smaill F, Hofmeyr GJ. Antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002:CD000933. |
|2.||Sinha K. C-section births on rise in India. The Times of India 2010 Jan 14. Available from http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com//india/C-section-births-on-rise-in-India/articleshow/5442238.cms. |
|3.||Pitt C, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Adjunctive intravaginal metronidazole for the prevention of postcesarean endometritis: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:745-50. |
|4.||Kayihura V, Osman NB, Bugalho A, Burgstorm S. Choice of antibiotics for infection prophylaxis in emergency caesarean sections in low-income countries: A cost-benefit study in Mozambique. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003;82:636-41. |
|5.||Shakya A, Sharma J. Comparison of single versus multiple doses of antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing post-elective caesarean section infectious morbidity. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2010;8:179-84. |
[Table 1], [Table 2]