|Year : 2008 | Volume
| Issue : 5 | Page : 197-208
Recent advances in pharmacotherapy of glaucoma
SK Gupta1, Niranjan D Galpalli1, SS Agrawal1, Sushma Srivastava1, Rohit Saxena2
1 Delhi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, New Delhi, India
2 Dr. Rajendra Prasad Center for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
|Date of Submission||19-Nov-2007|
|Date of Decision||25-Feb-2008|
|Date of Acceptance||14-Oct-2008|
S K Gupta
Delhi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, New Delhi
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Glaucoma is a slow progressive degeneration of the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and the optic nerve axons, leading to irreversible blindness if left undiagnosed and untreated. Although increased intraocular pressure is a major risk factor of glaucoma, other factors include increased glutamate levels, alterations in nitric oxide (NO) metabolism, vascular alterations and oxidative damage caused by reactive oxygen species. Glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness globally, accounting for 12.3% of the total blindness. Glaucoma has been broadly classified as primary or secondary open-angle or angle-closure glaucoma. The primary goal in management of glaucoma is to prevent the risk factor, especially elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), using medications, laser therapy or conventional surgery. The first-line treatment of glaucoma usually begins with the use of a topical selective or nonselective blocker or a prostaglandin analog. Second-line drugs of choice include alpha-agonists and topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Cholinergic agonists are considered third-line treatment options. When a single therapy is not sufficient to lower the IOP, a combination therapy is indicated. To enhance the patient compliance, drug delivery systems like electronic devices, ocular inserts, tansdermal and mechanical drug delivery systems have been developed. Use of viscoelastic agents in ophthalmic formulations, emulsions and soluble ophthalmic drug inserts (SODI) enhance patience compliance and ocular drug delivery in patients in long-term glaucoma therapy. For patients who do not respond to antiglaucoma medications, laser trabeculoplasty and incisional surgery are recommended. Several nutrients and botanicals hold promise for the treatment of glaucoma, but most studies are preliminary, and larger, controlled studies are required. Future directions for the development of a novel therapy glaucoma may target glutamate inhibition, NMDA receptor blockade, exogenously applied neurotrophins, open channel blockers, antioxidants, protease inhibitors and gene therapy.
Keywords: Adrenergic blockers, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, cholinergic agonists, intraocular pressure, prostaglandin analogs
|How to cite this article:|
Gupta S K, Galpalli ND, Agrawal S S, Srivastava S, Saxena R. Recent advances in pharmacotherapy of glaucoma. Indian J Pharmacol 2008;40:197-208
| » Introduction|| |
Glaucoma is characterized by slow progressive degeneration of the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and the optic nerve axons, leading to increasing deterioration of the visual field. If untreated, the condition can lead to irreversible blindness. 
Glaucoma represents a common pathway for different eye conditions, many of which are associated with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). The involvement of excitatory and inhibitory nerve transmitters like glutamates, gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA), glycine and apoptosis can be implicated as a mechanism of progression of glaucoma. Early detection and treatment can slow, or even halt the progression of the disease. However, glaucoma often progresses despite lowering of the IOP to acceptable or normal levels. 
Glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness. Worldwide, it is estimated that about 66.8 million people have visual impairment from glaucoma, with 6.7 million suffering from blindness. The prevalence of glaucoma increases with age. Two percent of the population older than 40 years of age and five to nine percent of those older than 65 years have glaucoma. , It is estimated that there will be 60.5 million people with OAG (open angle glaucoma) and ACG (angle closure glaucoma) in 2010, which will increase to 79.6 million by 2020. Of these, 74% will have OAG. From 2010 to 2020, the most detectable change in glaucoma worldwide will be an increase of the incidence of glaucoma in India. As the proportion of those over age 40 increases, the proportional increase in glaucoma will challenge our resources and ingenuity. 
Risk factors for the development of glaucoma
Although increased intraocular pressure is the major risk factor for primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), other factors such as increased glutamate levels, alterations in nitric oxide (NO) metabolism, vascular alterations and oxidative damage caused by reactive oxygen species  are also involved [Table 1].
| » Types of Glaucoma|| |
There are various types of glaucoma. These are:
Primary open angle glaucoma
It is the most common form of glaucoma throughout world, accounting for about two-thirds of cases.  The anterior chamber is deep and there is reduced aqueous outflow through the trabecular meshwork, which leads to a rise in IOP.
Normal tension glaucoma
It is believed to account for 30% of the glaucoma cases in Western countries and over two-thirds of the cases in Japan. Its incidence in the Indian population is generally considered low. Here, the IOP is within the normal range; however, there may be poor blood flow to the optical disc or increased susceptibility to disc damage at lower IOP.
Primary angle closure glaucoma
It accounts for nearly 50% of the cases in India. The rise in IOP is caused by closure of the anterior chamber angle. This may be either acute or chronic.
Secondary open angle or angle closure glaucoma
This is caused by substances mechanically blocking the anterior chamber angle (pigmentary or pseudoexfoliation) or due to an alteration in the structure and function of the trabecular meshwork, owing to trauma, inflammation or ischaemia. ,,
Pharmacotherapy of glaucoma
Prevention/control of raised intraocular pressure is the primary goal in the management of glaucoma. Modern medicine focuses on three separate targets: IOP, outflow facility, and the retinal ganglion cell, to help us achieve the ultimate goal of therapy and to preserve the visual function in these patients [Table 2], [Figure 1]. Many glaucoma medications either reduce or control IOP. But the progression of glaucomatous optic neuropathy can occur even when the IOP is within normal or low range.
The antiglaucoma agents act on the aqueous humor dynamics to reduce the intraocular pressure by different mechanisms.
- Miotics in angle closure glaucoma act by contraction of sphincter pupillae, which removes papillary block and reverses obliteration of the iridocorneal angle.
- Miotics in open closure glaucoma act by contraction of the ciliary muscle pulls on the scleral spur and improves trabecular patency.
- β-blockers and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors reduce aqueous humor secretion by the ciliary body.
- Prostaglandins increase uveoscleral out flow by altering permeability or pressure gradients.
Cholinergics were introduced over 100 years ago and they were the first class of agents used for the treatment of glaucoma.
Direct acting agents work directly on the parasympathetic receptors in the eye, whereas indirect-acting agents inhibit acetylcholinesterase enzyme.
Pilocarpine [Figure 2] is a muscarinic alkaloid obtained from the leaves of tropical American shrubs, from the genus Pilocarpus. It is the most widely used cholinergic drug for the treatment of glaucoma. It acts by stimulating the muscarinic receptors of the ciliary muscle, which widens the anterior chamber angle, resulting in an increased outflow of aqueous humor through the trabecular meshwork. It is available in concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 10% eye drops. Although it has been available for decades for the treatment of glaucoma, its usage has declined, since more drug options with fewer side effects have become available.
A long term randomized study with combination of pilocarpine 1% and clonidine 0.125% showed an IOP reduction comparable to that achieved with timolol 0.25% twice daily. This combination could be used as a first line therapy in patients wherein β-blockers are contraindicated.  The side effects of this drug include miosis, induced accommodation, brow ache, myopic shift, increase risk of retinal detachment and iritis. Pilocarpine produces a reduction in IOP, similar to that of beta-blocking agents, but it is no longer considered a first-line agent for glaucoma treatment, owing to its short duration of action (four to six hours) and side effects.
Delivery systems for pilocarpine
Pilocarpine gel: Pilocarpine hydrochloride 4% in a highly viscous acrylic vehicle, when applied once daily at bedtime, has been reported to produce significant reduction in IOP for 24 hours.
Membrane-controlled delivery system: This is an insert placed in the cul-de-sac, where it gradually releases pilocarpine at the rate of 20mg/hour, which is roughly equivalent to 2% eye drops. This is effective for seven days and follows zero order kinetics.
Electronic medication alarm device: This device enhances the compliance in glaucoma patients taking pilocarpine.
Adrenergic drugs lower intraocular pressure by decreasing blood flow in the ciliary body and through direct receptor-related reduction of aqueous humor production. 
Epinephrine is a direct acting sympathomimetic amine. Epinephrine stimulates both a and β-adrenoreceptors within the eye. It reduces IOP by increasing the aqueous humor outflow through the trabecular meshwork and uveoscleral pathway. However, recent studies have shown that topical epinephrine did not significantly affect the uveoscleral outflow or the episcleral venous pressure. ,, Reduction in IOP ranges from 15-25% for epinephrine, but is accompanied by adverse effects including blurred vision, headache, palpitations, high blood pressure, and anxiety.
Dipivefrin is a prodrug of epinephrine, formed by the diesterification of epinephrine and pivalic acid. The addition of two ester groups (pivaloyl) to the epinephrine molecule enhances its lipophilic character, which helps easy penetration into the anterior chamber. Since it penetrates more easily across the cornea, lesser doses are required. The IOP reduction with dipivefrin is comparable with that of epinephrine. The liberated epinephrine exerts its action by decreasing aqueous production and by enhancing outflow facility. The onset of action with dipivefrin occurs about 30 minutes after treatment, with maximum effect seen at about one hour.
Dipivefrin is more effective than epinephrine; it penetrates the cornea approximately 17 times more than epinephrine.  It is indicated for initial therapy or as an adjunct with other ocular hypotensive agents. It produces 20-24% reduction in IOP. Topical dipivefrin 0.1% is useful for lowering IOP in patients intolerant to epinephrine.  The most frequent side effects reported with dipivefrin include burning, stinging, follicular conjunctivitis, blurry vision, headache, and allergic reaction.
| » Alpha-2-AGONISTS|| |
Clonidine is the first available a-2 agonist, for the treatment of glaucoma. Clonidine is a lipophilic molecule, which is a relatively selective a-2 adrenoceptor agonist with some a-1 adrenoceptor agonistic activity. It crosses the blood brain barrier and causes systemic hypotension.
Apraclonidine or para aminoclonidine is a derivative a-2 adrenergic agonist. It decrease the aqueous humor secretion and the episcleral venous pressure.  It is not recommended as a long-term therapy because of the high incidence of local adverse reactions and tachyphylaxis. It is indicated for short-term use for the prevention or control of post-surgical increases in IOP, and indicated as an adjunctive agent for POAG. Long-term therapy with apraclonidine causes allergic blepharoconjuctivitis. The mean reductions in IOP range from 20% to 27%.  Apraclonidine is available as 0.5 and 1% concentrations, to be applied twice daily.
Brimonidine is the a-2 agonist of choice in glaucoma treatment, which acts by decreasing the aqueous humor secretion and increasing the uveoscleral outflow. It does not cross the blood-brain barrier and is 30 times more selective for the a-2-adrenergic receptor than apraclonidine.  Brimonidine is believed to have neuroprotective effect, which is an important parameter of glaucoma pathogenesis.
Brimonidine is used as a first-line therapy in patients who have contraindications to β blockers. In a double-masked, placebo-controlled trial, brimonidine was effective in reducing the IOP in patients with elevated IOP. Its efficacy was equivalent to that of apraclonidine.  Due to high selective action on a-2 adrenoceptor agonist activity, the IOP-lowering ability of brimonidine may be comparable with that of timolol and dorzolamide and superior to betaxolol. ,, Brimonidine is available as 0.2 and 0.5%, to be applied twice daily.
| » β BLOCKERS|| |
Since their introduction in 1979, β blockers have become first line therapy for glaucoma. These agents reduce intraocular pressure (IOP), thereby preventing damage to the optic nerve and subsequent loss of vision. Timolol, betaxolol, levobunolol, metipranolol, and carteolol are the topical beta-blockers available in the market. They have similar IOP-lowering efficacy, but differ in other pharmacological properties.
Timolol has become the most widely used ocular hypotensive agent. The potential side effects associated with its nonselective beta-blockade have prevented its use in patients with reactive airways disease and with various cardiovascular conditions. Topically administered β blockers are generally well-tolerated. However, they undergo systemic absorption and can adversely affect cardiovascular and bronchopulmonary function in patients with existing diseases such as heart failure, sinus bradycardia, chronic obstructive airways disease or asthma.
Local adverse effects associated with β -blockers include stinging, burning, red eye, itching, tearing and loss of corneal sensitivity. ,
Timolol [Figure 3], introduced in 1978, was the first β adrenocpetor antagonist approved for the treatment of glaucoma. It lowers IOP by decreasing aqueous humor formation. It reduces IOP by 20-35%, on an average. , It is very effective during waking hours and causes less reduction in IOP in night.  Early trials demonstrated that it is more effective in lowering IOP, as compared to epinephrine and pilocarpine. 
Timolol is available as 0.25% and 0.5% ophthalmic solutions, to be applied twice daily, and also as once-daily gel (0.5%) forming solutions (Timoptic XE). With timolol, systemic complications occur more frequently, including a variety of cardiovascular, respiratory, central nervous system, gastrointestinal, and dermatologic reactions. Ocular side effects were also reported, including superficial punctate keratitis, ocular pain or discomfort, corneal anesthesia, and vague visual disturbances.  Timolol is the US-FDA's gold standard drug for glaucoma therapy, against which all new medications must be compared prior to approval.
Carteolol hydrochloride [Figure 4] ophthalmic solution, 1%, is a nonselective beta-adrenergic blocking agent with associated intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. It was hoped that the intrinsic sympthomimetic activity (ISA) of carteolol might protect against some of the systemic adverse effects such as reduced pulse and blood pressure, seen with other beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists. Given topically twice daily in controlled domestic clinical trials, carteolol produced a median percent reduction of IOP 22 to 25%. Carteolol 1% showed comparable ocular hypotensive effect and a safety profile, similar to those of timolol 0.5% solution, and it was better tolerated, with regard to stinging and irritation. 
Levonunalol acts by reducing aqueous humor formation and increasing outflow facility.  The onset of action with levobunalol is seen within one hour and the maximum effect is observed between two and six hours. A majority of it is metabolized into an active metabolite di-hydrolevobunolol, which is also effective at lowering IOP. It is used clinically in a concentration of 0.5 to 1%, twice or once a day.
Betaxolol [Figure 4] is a relatively selective β-1 blocker, which in most patients is almost as effective as timolol in lowering intraocular pressure and may be partly additive with dipivefrin. It is probably safer in patients unable to tolerate non-selective β -blockers. 
The onset of action with betaxolol is within 30 minutes and the maximum effect is observed two hours after topical administration. It is available as 0.25% ophthalmic suspension, to be administered twice daily. Stinging upon instillation is a particularly frequent finding with betaxolol (up to 30% to 40% of patients). Unlike other topically applied beta-blockers, betaxolol plays an additional role in blocking N-methyl-Daspartate (NMDA) gated calcium channels.
Systemic carbonic anhydrase inhibitors
Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors are sulfonamide drugs, which act on the ciliary epithelium, on -carbonic anhydrase isoenzyme II catalyses conversion of CO 2 and H 2 O to HCO 3 and H+, a process important for the production of aqueous humor.
Acetazolamide and methazolamide are able to reduce IOP, when taken orally, by decreasing aqueous production. Acetazolamide tablets (125 mg and 250 mg) and methazolamide tablets (25 and 50 mg) are available in the market. Acetazolamide is administered four times daily and methazolamide two or three times daily. Both medications cause several side effects, including paresthesia of fingertips and toes, fatigue, depression, kidney stones, thrombocytopenia, agranulocystosis, and aplastic anemia. 
Topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors
Dorzolamide [Figure 5] was the first topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor launched in the market.
Dorzolamide reduces IOP by decreasing aqueous production, through the inhibition of the enzyme carbonic anhydrase in the ciliary body. When β-blockers are contraindicated, dorzolamide may be used as a first-line therapy. It has excellent additivity with β blockers and pilocarpine. 
Dorzolamide is most commonly prescribed as an add-on therapy. It is available as a 2% ophthalmic solution applied three times daily. An IOP reduction of approximately 19-23% is observed. 
A combination of latanoprost and dorzolamide showed additive effect in lowering the IOP in a trial with 30 patients of ocular hypertension or early capsular or primary open-angle glaucoma and elevated IOP.  A double-masked, randomized one-year study revealed that ocular hypotensive efficacy of 2.0% dorzolamide, given three times a day, is comparable with that of 0.5% betaxolol, given twice daily.  Systemic side effects are minimal, as compared with those of oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. However, there were local side effects, including corneal edema, borderline endothelial function, decreased visual acuity and allergic reactions. Local adverse events seen with dorzolamide include stinging, burning and itching.
Brinzolamide, available as 1% ophthalmic suspension, has been able to lower IOP as well as dorzolamide. Its pH of 7.4 equivalent to that of human tears makes it better tolerated than dorzolamide (pH 5.5) by most patients. ,
A multicenter, double-masked, prospective, parallel-group study showed that brinzolamide 1.0% caused less ocular discomfort than dorzolamide 2.0%. The incidence of ocular discomfort (burning and stinging) on instillation of brinzolamide (twice daily, 1.8%; three times daily, 3.0%) was significantly less compared with the treatment with dorzolamide (16.4%). 
Prostaglandins (PG) are known mediators of inflammation. At high doses, they can induce increased IOP. Conversely, at low doses prostaglandins have been shown to lower IOP.  Hypotensive lipids, named as eicosanoids, including latanoprost, travaprost and bimatoprost. Prostaglandin analogs [Figure 6] represent a novel class of topically active ocular hypotensive agents with a unique mechanism of action.
Latanoprost, an ester prodrug analogue of a prostaglandin F2a (13,14-dihydro-17-phenyl-18, 19, 20-trinor-PGF2a isopropyl ester) analogue, is a selective prostanoid FP receptor agonist. Several clinical trials have demonstrated that it can be combined with timolol, acetazolamide, epinephrine, and pilocarpine, probably due to its unique IOP-reducing mechanism. ,,,,,
Latanoprost reduces IOP by increasing the aqueous outflow from the eye, through the uveoscleral pathway.  How this occurs is not known, but it is thought that they bind to the receptors of the ciliary body and upregulate metalloproteinases. These enzymes remodel the extracellular matrix and make the area more permeable to aqueous humor, thereby increasing outflow.  A single drop of latanoprost 0.005% solution (about 1.5µg) once daily has been established as the most effective dosage regimen. 
Since its introduction in 1996 in the US, latanoprost has become the most popular drug for the treatment of glaucoma around the world. Latanoprost has been compared with timolol in several multicentric clinical trials. Once-daily latanoprost was found to be more effective in lowering IOP than twice daily timolol. The mean IOP reduction was 6.7± 3.4 mmHg for latanoprost and 4.9±2.9 mmHg for timolol, after 6 months' treatment. ,,
Latanoprost was found to be effective in reducing IOP during the evening as well as during the day.  A long-term study of five years with latanoprost has shown no loss in efficacy in treating glaucoma patients, for this study latanoprost was declared as the only PGA to have received a formal first-line usage approval from the US-FDA. In some studies, latanoprost was found to be equally significantly more effective in reducing IOP than dorzolamide and brimonidine.  In a comparative study between three PGAs latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travaprost, it was found that all the three drugs were comparable in their ability to reduce IOP in OAG and OH patients. Latanoprost exhibited greater ocular tolerability.  Latanoprost is available in 0.005% solution, administered in the evening and requiring refrigeration for long-term storage as well as protection from sunlight and stability. 
Conjunctival hyperemia occurs within the first two days after instillation of latanoprost treatment, which diminishes with time (after two to four weeks). Increased iris pigmentation has been reported in 5 to 25% of glaucoma patients treated with latanoprost. Irideal darkening may be a result of a prostaglandin-stimulated increase in melanin production.  Several effects on eyelid and lashes were seen, following treatment with latanoprost, including an increase in the length, number, colour and thickness. 
Previous surgery or a history of intraocular inflammation may predispose some glaucoma patients treated with latanoprost to cystoid macular oedema or uveitis. Systemic adverse effects are relatively not seen because the drug and its metabolites have rapid elimination half-life.
[Figure 6]: Chemical structures of prostaglandin F2a and commercially available drugs belonging to prostaglandin analogues
Unoprostone Isopropylate is a docosanoid, a structural analogue of an inactive biosynthetic cyclic derivative of arachidonic acid, 13, 14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F2a. Its chemical name is isopropyl (+)-(Z)-7-[(1R, 2R, 3R, 5S)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-(3oxodecyl) cyclopentyl] -5-heptenoate. It differs structurally from other PGAs in that it has a 22-carbon chain backbone, instead of the typical truncated 20-carbon structure found in other agents [Figure 1] It is available in 0.15% ophthalmic formulation, to be applied twice daily.
Unoprostone decreases IOP by increasing the outflow facility without affecting aqueous humor production.  When used in monotherapy, Unoprostone provided a clinically significant IOP-lowering effect, equivalent to that of betaxolol but not to those of timolol and latanoprost. , However, in another study, an aqueous solution of 0.12% unoprostone isopropyl, applied topically to the eye twice daily for six weeks, was as effective as 0.5% timolol in maintaining control of IOP in subjects with chronic open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.  In a six-month study, it was found that unoprostone isopropyl beneficially provides additive IOP lowering effect to topical β-blocker in patients with primary open angle glaucoma. No serious systemic side effects were found in the present study.
A study involving thirty healthy volunteers, Unoprostone significantly increased microcirculation in the optic nerve head (ONH) in control subjects and in normal tension glaucoma patients, without reducing the IOP significantly.  A long term comparative study between topical antiglaucoma therapy of timolol and unoprostone as against betaxolol and unoprostone revealed that both combined treatments were effective for IOP reduction in glaucoma patients, and the data from the Betaxolol and Unoprostone treatment group suggested that Betaxolol and Unoprostone was more effective in maintaining visual field than timolol and unoprostone.  Unoprostone instillation increases blood flow in the choroidretina in human eyes.  Iris hyperpigmentation and abnormal eyelash changes may occur after treatment with unoprostone, but the incidence of these events were low in the two-year clinical study. 
Bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% is a synthetic prostamide analog with ocular hypotensive activity. Its chemical name is (Z)-7-[(1R,2R,3R,5S)-3,5-dihydroxy-2[1E,3S) -3-hydroxy-5-phenyl-1-pentenyl]cyclopentyl]- 5-N-ethylheptenamide.
Bimatoprost is known as prostamide analog, because of the unique structural presence of an amide ester group at the carboxy terminal end of the a carbon chain [Figure 6].
Bimatoprost interacts with a prostamide receptor in the trabecular meshwork, to increase outflow facility.  Bimatoprost enhances the pressure-sensitive outflow pathway and may also cause an increase in the rate of flow via the pressure-insensitive outflow pathway and a lowering of the extraocular recipient pressure. 
In a six-month multicentric, randomized controlled trial, bimatoprost proved to be statistically and clinically superior to timolol in lowering IOP in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. The most frequent side effect was trace-to-mild conjunctival hyperemia. Changes in iris pigmentation were reported in 1.1% of bimatoprost patients. 
A multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel-group trial bimatoprost provided lower mean pressures than latanoprost at every time point throughout the study and was statistically superior in achieving low target pressures.  A six-month trial study revealed that the IOP-lowering efficacies of bimatoprost and timolol-dorzolamide combination were similar; thus, bimatoprost can be used as a long-term monotherapy agent in the treatment of POAG and ocular hypertension. 
Bimatoprost is available in 0.03% ophthalmic solution and is administered once daily in the evening. It does not require refrigeration to maintain stability. 
Travaprost is a synthetic prostaglandin F 2a analogue. Its chemical name is isopropyl (Z)-7- [(1 R,2 R,3 R,5 S)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-[(1 E,3 R)-3-hydroxy-4-[(a,a,a-trifluoro- m -tolyl)oxy]-1- butenyl]cyclopentyl]-5-heptenoate. Following absorption into the eye, the free acid form of travaprost interacts with the endogenous FP prostanoid receptor, to enhance aqueous humor outflow and lower intraocular pressure (IOP). It differs from other PGAs, which exhibit partial agonist activity, in that it is a full agonist at the PGF2a receptor. 
In clinical studies, travaprost once daily produced reductions in IOP of between 7-8 mmHg, from a mean baseline IOP of 25-27 mmHg, an effect similar to that noted in the case of bimatoprost or latanoprost.  In controlled clinical trials, travaprost 0.004% once daily, used as monotherapy, produced greater IOP reduction than timolol 0.5% b.i.d and equal or greater reduction than latanoprost 0.005%. 
Travaprost 0.004% was also shown to be an effective adjunctive agent, offering an additional 5 - 7 mmHg IOP reduction in patients inadequately controlled on timolol 0.5%. In trial, it was observed that travaprost monotherapy had better lowering than dorzolamide 2.0% timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination. 
Travaprost provides robust lowering of IOP with little diurnal fluctuation and results in low target pressures in a large percentage of the patients.  It is very stable compound, to be applied once daily in the evening. It does not require refrigeration and protection from sunlight. 
Macular oedema, including cystoid macular oedema, is cited as a warning in the US product labeling for travaprost, as it is for other prostaglandin analogues.
When a single therapy is not sufficient to lower the IOP, a combined treatment is indicated. The combination therapy is also dependent upon the mechanism through which the components act to reduce IOP. When choosing an agent for combination therapy, it should be borne in mind that those drugs with complementary mechanisms of action usually work together. Fixed-combination products have the combined efficacy of two ocular hypotensive drugs and the convenience of a two-drug treatment regimen in a single container, which may aid patient adherence to treatment. If a beta-blocking agent is used as an initial treatment, adding a topical CAI can provide an additional reduction in IOP.  Another combination product comprises 0.005% latanoprost and 0.5% timolol. The addition of latanoprost to timolol treatment produces an additional IOP reduction of 13-37%, depending upon the frequency of the application and the baseline IOP. Available fixed-combination products consist of timolol 0.5% as an invariant, with brimonidine 0.2%, dorzolamide 2%, travaprost 0.004%, latanoprost 0.005% or bimatoprost 0.03%. 
The range of reported additional reductions in IOP, compared to a latanoprost monotherapy baseline are as follows: latanoprost-timolol (13-37%), latanoprostpilocarpine 2% (7-14%), latanoprost and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (15-24.1%), and latanoprost and dipivefrin (15-28%). 
Brimonidine 0.2% combined with 0.5% timolol is the newest fixed combination product in the market. Clinical trials have demonstrated that dorzolamide/timolol (1 drop per eye twice daily) is an effective and generally well-tolerated fixed combination for lowering IOP in patients with open angle glaucoma or OH, including individuals uncontrolled on β -adrenoceptor antagonist monotherapy. 
A secondary choice of treatment of glaucoma is the use of laser therapy. The primary strategy involves 'burning' holes in various areas within the eyes, including the ciliary and the pigmented trabecular meshwork cells. 
Argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT) targets trabecular meshwork, where it allows the aqueous fluid to leave the eye more efficiently. The procedure requires 10-20 minutes and 80% of the patients respond well to it and may eventually discontinue glaucoma medications. 
The Nd : YAG (neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet) laser can also be used in closed-angle glaucoma to make a small peripheral hole in the iris, to allow the aqueous fluid to flow easily. Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) delivers energy to pigmented trabecular meshwork cells in a process called photo-thermolysis. The advantage of SLT is that nonpigmented trabecular meshwork (TM) cells may sustain less damage compared with ALT. 
Trabeculectomy should be considered in all patients, when the 'target IOP' is not achieved with glaucoma medications and if the expected rate of visual loss could affect the patient during their lifetime. In this procedure, an opening is made in the trabecular meshwork, so that aqueous humor can drain into the sclera.
Many patients can discontinue glaucoma medications after surgery. Approximately one-third of the trabeculectomy patients develop cataract within five years. If trabeculectomy fails, another type of surgery places a drainage tube (Molteno tube) in the eye, between the cornea and iris, which exits at the junction of the cornea and sclera. Cyclodestructive procedures, which lower IOP by destroying the ciliary body, are typically reserved for eyes, which are refractory to all other forms of therapy. These procedures include cyclocryotherapy, cylcodiathermy and laser cyclophotocoagulation. ,,
Complementary and alternative system of medicine
In recent times, there has been an increased interest in complementary medicine. But very little research has been done on the majority of herbal remedies, with regard to their effect on glaucoma. There are several nutrients and botanicals that hold promise for the treatment of glaucoma, but most studies are preliminary, and larger, controlled studies are required. 
Forskolin is a diterpine derivative of the plant Coleus forskohlii, which acts on adenylate cyclase catalytic subunit to increase intracellular cAMP. Gingko biloba extract has multiple beneficial actions, which will be helpful in the treatment of glaucoma, like increased ocular blood flow, antioxidant activity, platelet activating factor inhibitory activity, nitric oxide inhibition, and neuroprotective activity combine, suggesting that Gingko biloba extract could be used in the treatment of glaucoma. 
In a recent trial in Italy, which was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double masked trial involving 27 patients, there was an improvement in the visual fields in-patient, with normal tension glaucoma after four weeks of treatment with Ginkgo biloba. 
Alpha lipoic acid, a powerful antioxidant, may be useful in glaucoma, because it reduces nerve cell damage from oxidative stress.  Supplementation with Vitamin C is believed to increase aqueous humor drainage, through reducing the viscosity of hyaluronic acid in the trabecular meshwork.
In China, the main herb-derived eye drops for glaucoma are pueraria flavonoids, areca seed extract, and alkaloids from erycibe (Erycibe obtusifolia; dinggongteng aka baogongteng). These eye drops appear to work as well or better than pilocarpine, which is usually used as a comparative standard. Salvia miltiorrhiza is a Chinese herb, injected intravenously (solution) and which helps to improve microcirculation of the retinal ganglion cells.
Cannabinoids reduce intraocular pressure by enhancing uveoscleral outflow. The development of formulation for ocular administration has not yet yielded a prescription medication.
Future glaucoma therapy
A number of potential strategies for the development of a novel therapy for glaucoma are: glutamate inhibition, NMDA receptor blockade, exogenously applied neurotrophins, open channel blockers, antioxidants, protease inhibitors and gene therapy.
NMDA receptor antagonists
NMDA antagonist provides neuroprotection by blocking pathological increase in glutamate, which drives cell death by facilitating calcium entry into a cell. Memantine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate subtype glutamate receptor antagonist is in the clinical stage of development, and, if there is proof of efficacy of memantine, it will change the treatment paradigm for glaucoma. 
In addition to memantine, a number of other potential non-IOP lowering direct acting neuroprotective agents are shown to have an application in glaucoma. Many of these agents focus on other routes of overcoming glutamate cytotoxicity.
Compounds on clinical trials are -
Eliprodil: It is a non-competitive NMDA antagonist; providing protection from glutamate mediated cytotoxicity to retinal ganglion cells.
Riluzole: It is a presynaptic glutamate release inhibitor, which has shown to have potential neuroprotective utility.
L-deprenyl: An inhibit apoptosis of serum deprived retrovirus-immortilised retinal ganglion cells in vivo, it can decrease the apoptosis index of primary mix retinal cells, when deprived of specific neurotropic factors.
Since resistance to high IOP is immune-dependent, T-cell induced neuroprotection may vaccinate the RGC from apoptosis. An example of a neuroprotective vaccine is R16, a peptide (interphotoreceptor-retinoid binding protein) derived from the RGC. 
Signal transducers and activators of transcription protein-3 (STAT-3) play an important role in cell growth and differentiation. They are considered important because the mRNA of this protein is upregulated in rats with glaucoma. Ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), which is an interleukin-6 cytokine injected into the eyes of rats with increased IOP reduced apoptosis, phosphorylated STAT-3, and reduced the activity of caspase-3. Interleukin-10 also has neuroprotective activity, which promotes survival of RGCs, due to IL-10 signaling through the STAT-3 pathway.,,[1 03]
Erythropoietin is a hematopoietic cytokine, which has been shown to possess remarkable tissue-protective and neuroprotective properties that may prevent further RGC death by inhibiting apoptosis.  Intravitreal injection of Erythropoietin in rats with axotomized RGCs enhances RGC survival by 92%, as compared to those without EPO injection. In addition, EPO reduces caspase activity, indicated by a decrease in the absorbance of colorimetric caspase substrates. However, further studies are needed to fully evaluate the safety and efficacy of this neuroprotective agent in clinical trials. 
Gene therapy represents an attractive approach for the treatment of eye diseases such as glaucoma. Inhibitors of apoptosis protein (IAP) can also reduce apoptosis by inhibiting caspase. Ocular administration of viral vectors produces localized retinal gene expression with reduced risks of side effects reported with systemic administration of viral vectors. Rats were given unilateral intravitreal injections of AAV-CBA vector coding for human baculoviral IAP repeat-containing protein-4 (BIRC4), a potent caspase inhibitor. Gene therapy delivering BIRC4 significantly promoted optic nerve axon survival in a chronic ocular hypertensive model of rat glaucoma. Blocking RGC apoptosis with caspase inhibitors represents a promising approach for treatment of human glaucoma. ,
Since the upregulation of iNOS-2 is harmful to neurons, its inhibition might have a neuroprotective effect. Although an unregulated level of NO can cause neuronal degeneration via apoptosis, a small amount of NO could inhibit apoptosis. Survival of serum deprived pheochromocytoma PC-12 cells was observed when treated with an NO donor. These results indicate that the cytoprotective effect of nipradilol in PC12 cell death was due to the caspase-3 inhibition mediated by NO-related S-nitrosylation and activation of protein kinase G. 
| » Conclusions|| |
Glaucoma is a very serious eye disease that can lead to blindness if not treated early. With early diagnosis and treatment, most patients with glaucoma can have their vision restored and enjoy a healthy life. The wide variety of topical effective antiglaucoma drugs that are available today, and a few others that are in the development stage, represent significant advancement in ocular therapeutics. Though these topical ophthalmic preparations have reduced the risk of systemic toxicity to quite an extent, their long-term use causes systemic as well as ocular toxicity. Ideal drug candidates for glaucoma therapy will offer better IOP lowering efficacy with fewer side effects and provide additional means of vision sparing through direct protection of optic nerve. Despite new advances and techniques, it is observed that there is medically uncontrolled intraocular pressure. The ideal medication for this is not yet available. A patient with asthma, bradycardia, hazel eyes, cataracts, systemic allergy to sulfa drugs, and topical allergy to brimonidine might have to proceed with laser trabeculoplasty or glaucoma-filtering surgery.
Research on more advanced antiglaucoma medications continues and promising new directions appear to be the Rho-kinase inhibitors, microtubule-disrupting agents, serotonergics and cannabimimetics. The research is being directed towards applying new molecular and cellular techniques to induce regeneration of mammalian central nervous axons. This will be an important step in therapy for glaucomatous optic nerve atropy.
| » References|| |
|1.||Kumarasamy NA, Lam FS, Wang AL, Theoharides TC. Glaucoma: Current and developing concepts for inflammation, pathogenesis and treatment. Eur J Inflamm 2006;4:129-37. |
|2.||Ritch R. Natural compounds: Evidence for a protective role in eye disease. Can J Ophthalmol 2007;42:425-38. |
|3.||WHO report 2002. Available from: http://www.glaucom.com/Meetings/5-2/gsi.php. [cited in 2002]. |
|4.||Kim YY, Jung HR. Clarifying the nomenclature for primary angle-closure glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 1997;42:125-36. |
|5.||Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:262-7. |
|6.||Izzotti A, Bagnis A, Saccŕ SC. The role of oxidative stress in glaucoma. Mutat Res 2006;612:105-14. |
|7.||Robert EM, Jess TW. Management of glaucoma: Focus on pharmacological therapy. Drugs Aging 2005;22:1-21. |
|8.||Perry VM, Jane KM, Culy CR, Ibbotson T. Latanoprost an update of its use in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Drugs Aging 2003;20:597-30. |
|9.||Soltau J, Zimmerman TJ. Changing paradigms in the medical treatment of glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 2002;47:S2-5. |
|10.||Zimmerman TJ, Kooner KS, Sharir M, Fechtner RD, editors. Textbook of Ocular Pharmacology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1997. |
|11.||Sihota R, Rajashekhar YL, Venkatesh P, Agarwal H. A prospective, long-term, randomized study of the efficacy and safety of the drug combination pilocarpine 1% with clonidine 0.06% or clonidine 0.125% versus timolol 0.25%. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2002;18:499-506. |
|12.||Michelson G, Groh MJ. Dipivefrin reduces blood flow in the ciliary body in humans. Ophthalmol 1994;101:659-64. |
|13.||Townsend DJ, Brubaker RF. Immediate effect of epinephrine on aqueous formation in the normal human eye as measured by fluorophotometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1980;19:256-66. |
|14.||Nagataki S, Brubaker RF. Early effect of epinephrine on aqueous formation in the normal human eye. Ophthalmology 1981;88:278-82. |
|15.||Wang YL, Hayashi M, Yablonski ME, Toris CB. Effects of multiple dosing of epinephrine on aqueous humor dynamics in human eyes. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2002;18:53-63. |
|16.||Mandell AI, Stentz F, Kitabchi AE. Dipivalyl epinephrine: A new pro-drug in the treatment of glaucoma. Ophthalmol 1978;85:268-75. |
|17.||Yablonski ME, Shin DH, Kolker AE, Kass M, Becker B. Dipivefrin use in patients with intolerance to topically applied epinephrine. Arch Ophthalmol 1977;95:2157-8. |
|18.||Apatachioae I, Chiselita D. Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists in the treatment of glaucoma. Oftalmologia 1999;47:35-40. |
|19.||Lesar TS. Glaucoma. In: DiPiro JT, Talbert RL, editors. Pharmacotherapy: A pathophysiologic approach. 4th ed. Stamford, Connecticut: Appleton and Lange; 1999. p. 1466-78. |
|20.||Butler P, Mannschreck M, Lin S, Wang I, Alvarado J. Clinical experience with the long-term use of 1% apraclonidine: Incidence of allergic reactions. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:293-6. |
|21.||Schuman JS. Short-and long-term safety of glaucoma drugs. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2002;1:181-94. |
|22.||Yüksel N, Karabas L, Altintas O, Yildirim Y, Caglar Y. A comparison of the short-term hypotensive effects and side effects of unilateral brimonidine and apraclonidine in patients with elevated intraocular pressure. Ophthalmologica 2002;216:45-9. |
|23.||Katz L. Brimonidine tartrate 0.2% twice daily vs. timolol 0.5% twice daily: 1 year results in glaucoma patients. Am J Ophthalmol 1999;127:20-6. |
|24.||Stewart WC, Sharpe ED, Harbin TS Jr, Pastor SA, Day DG, Holmes KT, et al. Brimonidine 0.2% versus dorzolamide 2% each given three times daily to reduce intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:723-7. |
|25.||Javitt J, Goldberg I. Comparison of the clinical success rates and quality of life effects of brimonidine tartrate 0.2% and betaxolol 0.25% suspension in patients with open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. J Glaucoma 2000;9:298-308. |
|26.||Zimmerman TJ. Topical ophthalmic beta blockers: A comparative review. J Ocul Pharmacol 1993;9:373-84. |
|27.||Brooks AM, Gillies WE. Ocular beta-blockers in glaucoma management: Clinical pharmacological aspects. Drugs Aging 1992;2:208-21. |
|28.||Zimmerman TJ, Kaufman HE. Timolol, dose response and duration of action. Arch Ophthalmol 1977;95:605-7. |
|29.||Wilson RP, Kanal N, Spaeth GL. Timolol: Its effectiveness in different types of glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1979;86:43-50. |
|30.||Coakes RL, Brubaker RF. The mechanism of timolol in lowering intraocular pressure: In the normal eye. Arch Ophthalmol 1978;96:2045-8. |
|31.||Nelson WL, Fraunfelder FT, Sills JM, Arrowsmith JB, Kuritsky JN. Adverse respiratory and cardiovascular events attributed to timolol ophthalmic solution, 1978-1985. Am J Ophthalmol 1986;102:606-11. |
|32.||Trawick AB. Potential systemic and ocular side effects associated with topical administration of timolol maleate. J Am Optom Assoc 1985;56:108-12. |
|33.||Stewart WC, Cohen JS, Netland PA, Weiss H, Nussbaum LL. Efficacy of carteolol hydrochloride 1% vs timolol maleate 0.5% in patients with increased intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol 1997;124:498-505. |
|34.||Calugaru M. The effect of levobunolol eyedrops on trabecular outflow of aqueous humor in chronic simple glaucoma. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1989;194:164-9. |
|35.||Goldberg I. Betaxolol. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1989;17:9-13. |
|36.||Fraunfelder FT, Meyer SM, Bagby GC Jr, Dreis MW. Hematologic reactions to carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Am J Ophthalmol 1985;100:79-81. |
|37.||Talluto DM, Wyse TB, Krupin T. Topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: Cosopt a combination of dorzolamide and timolol has simplified the therapy for patients needing these two compounds. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1997;8:2-6. |
|38.||Hoyng PF, van Beek LM. Pharmacological therapy for glaucoma: A review. Drugs 2000;59:411-34. |
|39.||Kimal Arici M, Topalkara A, Güler C. Additive effect of latanoprost and dorzolamide in patients with elevated intraocular pressure. Int Ophthalmol 1998;22:37-42. |
|40.||Strahlman E, Tipping R, Vogel R .A double-masked, randomized 1-year study comparing dorzolamide (Trusopt), timolol, and betaxolol. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:1009-16. |
|41.||Sall K. The efficacy and safety of brinzolamide 1% ophthalmic suspension (Azopt) as a primary therapy in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Surv Ophthalmol 2000;44:S155-62. |
|42.||Barnebey H, Kwok SY. Patients' acceptance of a switch from dorzolamide to brinzolamide for the treatment of glaucoma in a clinical practice setting. Clin Ther 2000;22:1204-12. |
|43.||Silver LH. Clinical efficacy and safety of brinzolamide (Azopt): A new topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor for primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;126:400-8. |
|44.||Hoyng PFJ, Van Beek LM. Pharmacological therapy for glaucoma: A review. Drugs 2000;59:411-34. |
|45.||Alm A, Widengεrd I, Kjellgren D, Sφderstrφm M, Fristrφm B, Heijl A, et al. Latanoprost administered once daily caused a maintained reduction of intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients treated concomitantly with timolol. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:12-6. |
|46.||Hoyng PF, Rulo A, Greve E, Watson P, Alm A. The additive intraocular pressure-lowering effect of latanoprost in combined therapy with other ocular hypotensive agents. Surv Ophthalmol 1997;41:S93-8. |
|47.||Rulo AH, Greve EL, Hoyng PF. Additive effect of latanoprost: A prostaglandin F2a analogue, and timolol in patients with elevated intraocular pressure. Br J Ophthalmol 1994;78:899-902. |
|48.||Rulo AH, Greve EL, Hoyng PF. Additive ocular hypotensive effect of latanoprost and acetazolamide: A short-term study in patients with elevated intraocular pressure. Ophthalmology 1997;104:1503-7. |
|49.||Widengεrd I, Maepea O, Alm A. Effects of latanoprost and dipivefrin, alone or combined, on intraocular pressure and on bloodaqueous barrier permeability. Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:404-6. |
|50.||Fristrφm B, Nilsson SE. Interaction of PhXA41, a new prostaglandin analogue, with pilocarpine: a study on patients with elevated intraocular pressure. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:662-5. |
|51.||Novack GD, O'Donnell MJ, Molloy DW. New glaucoma medications in the geriatric population: Efficacy and safety. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;50:956-62. |
|52.||Marquis RE, Whitson JT. Management of glaucoma: Focus on pharmacological therapy. Drugs Aging 2005;22:1-21. |
|53.||Patel SS, Spencer CM. Latanoprost. A review of its pharmacological properties, and tolerability in the management of primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Drugs Aging 1996;9:363-78. |
|54.||Camras CB. Comparison of latanoprost and timolol in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma: A six-month masked, multicenter trial in the United States. Ophthalmology 1996;103:138-47. |
|55.||Watson P, Stjernschantz J. A six-month, randomized, double-masked study comparing latanoprost with timolol in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Ophthalmology 1996;103:126-37. |
|56.||Mishima HK, Masuda K, Kitazawa Y, Azuma I, Araie M. A comparison of latanoprost and timolol in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: A 12-week study. Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:929-32. |
|57.||Orzalesi N, Rossetti L, Invernizzi T, Bottoli A, Autelitano A. Effect of timolol, latanoprost, and dorzolamide on circadian IOP in glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:2566-73. |
|58.||DuBiner HB, Mroz M, Shapiro AM, Dirks MS; Brimonidine vs. Latanoprost Study Group. A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of brimonidine and latanoprost in adults with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: A three-month, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group trial. Clin Ther 2001;23:1969-83. |
|59.||Parrish RK, Palmberg P, Sheu WP; XLT Study Group. A comparison of latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travaprost in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: A 12-week, randomized, masked-evaluator multicenter study. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:688-703. |
|60.||Morgan PV, Proniuk S, Blanchard J, Noecker RJ. Effect of temperature and light on the stability of latanoprost and its clinical relevance. J Glaucoma 2001;10:401-5. |
|61.||Wistrand PJ, Stjernschantz J, Olsson K. The incidence and time-course of latanoprost-induced iridial pigmentation as a function of eye color. Surv Ophthalmol 1997;41:S129-38. |
|62.||Johnstone MA. Hypertrichosis and increased pigmentation of eyelashes and adjacent hair in the region of the ipsilateral eyelids of patients treated with unilateral topical latanoprost. Am J Ophthalmol 1997;124:544-7. |
|63.||Toris CB, Zhan G, Camras CB. Increase in outflow facility with unoprostone treatment in ocular hypertensive patients. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1782-7. |
|64.||Nordmann JP, Mertz B, Yannoulis NC, Schwenninger C, Kapik B, Shams N. A double-masked randomized comparison of the efficacy and safety of unoprostone with timolol and betaxolol in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma including pseudoexfoliation glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;133:1-10. |
|65.||Jampel HD, Bacharach J, Sheu WP, Wohl LG, Solish AM, Christie W. Randomized clinical trial of latanoprost and unoprostone in patients with elevated intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;134:863-71. |
|66.||Nordmann JP, Rouland JF, Mertz BP. A comparison of the intraocular pressure-lowering effect of 0.5% timolol maleate and the docosanoid derivative of a PGF2 alpha metabolite, 0.12% unoprostone, in subjects with chronic open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Curr Med Res Opin 1999;15:87-3. |
|67.||Leelachaikul Y, Euswas A. The efficacy of unoprostone isopropyl as an adjunct to topical beta-blocker in patients with open angle glaucoma: A-6month study. J Med Assoc Thai 2005;88:S100-4. |
|68.||Kimura I, Shinoda K, Tanino T, Ohtake Y, Mashima Y. Effect of topical unoprostone isopropyl on optic nerve head circulation in controls and in normal-tension glaucoma patients. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2005;49:287-93. |
|69.||Ohtake Y, Tanino T, Kimura I, Mashima Y, Oguchi Y. Long-term efficacy and safety of combined topical antiglaucoma therapy-timolol and unoprostone vs. betaxolol and unoprostone. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 2004;108:23-8. |
|70.||Kojima S, Sugiyama T, Azuma I, Konishi N, Fujii H. Effect of topically applied isopropyl unoprostone on microcirculation in the human ocular fundus evaluated with a laser speckle microcirculation analyzer. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 1997;101:605-10. |
|71.||McCarey BE, Kapik BM, Kane FE; Unoprostone Monotherapy Study Group. Low incidence of iris pigmentation and eyelash changes in 2 randomized clinical trials with unoprostone isopropyl 0.15%. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1480-8. |
|72.||Wan Z, Woodward DF, Cornell CL, Fliri HG, Martos JL, Pettit SN, et al. Bimatoprost, prostamide activity, and conventional drainage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:4107-15. |
|73.||Brubaker RF. Mechanism of action of bimatoprost (Lumigan). Surv Ophthalmol 2001;45:S347-51. |
|74.||Sherwood M, Brandt J; Bimatoprost Study Groups 1 and 2. Six-month comparison of bimatoprost once-daily and twice-daily with timolol twice-daily in patients with elevated intraocular pressure. Surv Ophthalmol 2001;45:S361-8. |
|75.||Gandolfi S, Simmons ST, Sturm R, Chen K, VanDenburgh AM. Three-month comparison of bimatoprost and latanoprost in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Adv Ther 2001;18:110-21. |
|76.||Ozturk F, Ermis SS, Inan UU. Comparison of the ocular hypotensive effects of bimatoprost and timolol-dorzolamide combination in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: A 6-month study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007;85:80-3. |
|77.||Cantor LB. An update on bimatoprost in glaucoma therapy. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2002;3:1753-62. |
|78.||Hellberg MR, Sallee VL, McLaughlin MA, Sharif NA, Desantis L, Dean TR,et al. Preclinical efficacy of travaprost: A potent and selective FP prostaglandin receptor agonist. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2001;17:421-32. |
|79.||Netland PA, Landry T, Sullivan EK, Andrew R, Silver L, Weiner A, et al. Travaprost compared with latanoprost and timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;132:472-84. |
|80.||Li N, Chen XM, Zhou Y, Wei ML, Yao X. Travaprost compared with other prostaglandin analogues or timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2006;34:755-64. |
|81.||Suzuki ER Jr, Franklin LM, da Silva LJ, Figueiredo CR, Netto JA, Batista WD. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of travaprost with a fixed-combination of dorzolamide and timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Curr Med Res Opin 2006;22:1799-805. |
|82.||Dubiner HB, Sircy MD, Landry T, Bergamini MV, Silver LH, Darell Turner F, et al. Comparison of the diurnal ocular hypotensive efficacy of travaprost and latanoprost over a 44-hour period in patients with elevated intraocular pressure. Clin Ther 2004;26:84-91. |
|83.||Whitson JT. Travaprost: A new prostaglandin analogue for the treatment of glaucoma. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2002;3:965-77. |
|84.||Marquis RE, Whitson JT. Management of glaucoma; focus on pharmacological therapy. Drugs Aging 2005;22:1-21. |
|85.||Woodward DF, Chen J. Fixed-combination and emerging glaucoma therapies. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2007;12:313-27. |
|86.||Higginbotham EJ, Diestelhorst M, Pfeiffer N, Rouland JF, Alm A. The efficacy and safety of unfixed and fixed combinations of latanoprost and other antiglaucoma medications. Surv Ophthalmol 2002;47:S133-40. |
|87.||Frampton JE, Perry CM. Topical dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution: A review of its use in the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Drugs Aging 2006;23:977-95. |
|88.||Schwartz K, Budenz D. Current management of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004;15:119-26. |
|89.||Vaidergorn PG, Susanna R Jr. Argon laser trabeculoplasty and reduction of ocular hypotensive medication used by glaucoma patients. Can J Ophthalmol 2006;41:44-50. |
|90.||Kramer TR, Noecker RJ. Comparison of the morphologic changes after selective laser trabeculoplasty and argon laser trabeculoplasty in human eye bank eyes. Ophthalmol 2001;108:773-9. |
|91.||De Roetth A Jr. Cryosurgery for the treatment of advanced chronic simple glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1968;66:1034-41. |
|92.||Dunphy EB, Albaugh CH. Cyclodiathermy: An operation for the treatment of glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1941;39:193-13. |
|93.||Peyman GA, Naguib KS, Gaasterland D. Trans-scleral application of a semiconductor diode laser. Lasers Surg Med 1990;10:569-75. |
|94.||Kathleen H. Natural therapies for ocular disorders part two: Cataracts and glaucoma. Alternat Med Rev 2001;6:141-62. |
|95.||Ritch R. Potential role for Ginkgo biloba extract in the treatment of glaucoma. Med Hypotheses 2000;54:221-35. |
|96.||Quaranta L, Bettelli S, Uva MG, Semeraro F, Turano R, Gandolfo E. Effect of Ginkgo biloba extract on preexisting visual field damage in normal tension glaucoma. Ophthalmol 2003;110:359-62. |
|97.||Filina AA, Davydova NG, Endrikhovskii SN, Shamshinova AM. Lipoic acid as a means of metabolic therapy of open-angle glaucoma. Vestn Oftalmol 1995;111:6-8. |
|98.||Zhang M. Comparison between baogongteng A and pilocarpine eyedrops in the treatment of primary glaucoma, Shanghai Med J 1981;4:24-7. |
|99.||Robert NW. Pathophysiology, Classification and treatment options of Glaucoma. Can J Opthalmol 2007;42:396-8. |
|100.||Bakalash SA, Kessler T, Mizrahi R, Nussenblatt, Schwartz M. Antigenic specificity of immunoprotective therapeutic vaccination for glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:3374-81. |
|101.||Thanos S, Naskar R. Correlation between retinal ganglion cell death and chronically developing inherited glaucoma in a new rat mutant. Exp Eye Res 2004;79:119-29. |
|102.||Adamus G, Sugden B, Shiraga S, Timmers AM, Hauswirth WW. Antiapoptotic effects of CNTF gene transfer on photoreceptor degeneration in experimental antibody-induced retinopathy. J Autoimmun 2003;21:121-9. |
|103.||Boyd ZS, Kriatchko A, Yang J, Agarwal N, Wax MB, Patil RV. Interleukin10 receptor signaling through STAT-3 regulates the apoptosis of retinal ganglion cells in response to stress. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:5206-11. |
|104.||Tsai JC, Song BJ, Wu L, Forbes M. Erythropoietin: A candidate neuroprotective agent in the treatment of glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2007;16:567-71. |
|105.||Weishaupt JH, Rohde G, Polking E, Siren AL, Ehrenreich H, Bahr M. Effect of erythropoietin axotomy-induced apoptosis in rat retinal ganglion cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:1514-22. |
|106.||Chong ZZ, Lin SH, Kang JQ, Maiese K. Erythropoietin prevents early and late neuronal demise through modulation of Akt1 and induction of caspase 1, 3 and 8. J Neurosci Res 2003;71:659-69. |
|107.||McKinnon SJ, Lehman DM, Tahzib NG, Ransom NL, Reitsamer HA, Liston P, et al. Baculoviral IAP repeat-containing-4 protects optic nerve axons in a rat glaucoma model. Mol Ther 2002;5:780-7. |
|108.||Baptiste DC, Hartwick AT, Jollimore CA, Baldridge WH, Seigel GM, Kelly E. An investigation of the neuroprotective effects of tetracycline derivatives in experimental models of retinal cell death. Mol Pharmacol 2004;66:1113-22. |
|109.||Tomita H, Nakazawa E, Sugano T, Tamai M. Nipradilol inhibits apoptosis by preventing the activation of caspase-3 via S-nitrosylation and the cGMP dependent pathway. Eur J Pharmacol 2002;452:263-8. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]
[Table 1], [Table 2]
|This article has been cited by|
||In Vitro and In-Eye Comparison of Commercial Pilocarpine Ophthalmic Solution and an Optimized, Reformulated Pilocarpine for Presbyopia Treatment
| ||Mitchell A. Jackson, Jaya Giyanani, Yumna Shabaik, Jeff Penzner, Anuradha V. Gore, Michael R. Robinson, George O. Waring |
| ||Ophthalmology and Therapy. 2022; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Ocular prodrugs: Attributes and challenges
| ||Jagpreet kour, Neha Kumari, Bharti Sapra |
| ||Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2021; 16(2): 175 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Glaucoma: Management and Future Perspectives for Nanotechnology-Based Treatment Modalities
| ||Nada M. El Hoffy, Engy A. Abdel Azim, Rania M. Hathout, Marwa A. Fouly, Seham A. Elkheshen |
| ||European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2021; 158: 105648 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Modulated approaches for strategic transportation of proteins and peptides via ocular route
| ||Maitri Bhatt, Pravin Shende |
| ||Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2021; 66: 102835 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Natural products: A lead for drug discovery and development
| ||Bhawna Chopra, Ashwani Kumar Dhingra |
| ||Phytotherapy Research. 2021; 35(9): 4660 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Combinations of Pilocarpine and Oxymetazoline for the Pharmacological Treatment of Presbyopia
| ||Francis W. Price, Milton Hom, Majid Moshirfar, David Evans, Haixia Liu, Jeff Penzner, Michael R. Robinson, Sungwook Lee, David L. Wirta |
| ||Ophthalmology Science. 2021; 1(4): 100065 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Innovations and revolutions in reducing retinal ganglion cell loss in glaucoma
| ||Mary Kelada, Daniel Hill, Timothy E. Yap, Haider Manzar, M. Francesca Cordeiro |
| ||Expert Review of Ophthalmology. 2021; 16(1): 33 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Influence of Circadian Rhythm in the Eye: Significance of Melatonin in Glaucoma
| ||Alejandro Martínez-Águila, Alba Martín-Gil, Carlos Carpena-Torres, Cristina Pastrana, Gonzalo Carracedo |
| ||Biomolecules. 2021; 11(3): 340 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||COMPARISON OF GONIOSCOPY AND ANTERIOR SEGMENT OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY IN THE ASSESSMENT OF ANTERIOR CHAMBER ANGLE IN GLAUCOMATOUS PATIENTS OF A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL OF KUMAOUN REGION
| ||Snigdha Joshi, Vimlesh Sharma, Shanti Pandey, Govind Singh Titiyal |
| ||INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH. 2021; : 20 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Tissue-Engineered Models for Glaucoma Research
| ||Renhao Lu, Paul Soden, Esak Lee |
| ||Micromachines. 2020; 11(6): 612 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Exploring of Taguchi Design in the Optimization of Brinzolamide and Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic in-situ Gel Used in Treatment of Glaucoma
| ||Purvi Shah, Vaishali Thakkar, Vishvas Anjana, Jenee Christian, Roma Trivedi , Kalpana Patel, Mukesh Gohel, Tejal Gandhi |
| ||Current Drug Therapy. 2020; 15(5): 524 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Translational Preclinical Pharmacologic Disease Models for Ophthalmic Drug Development
| ||Mihir Shah, Sara Cabrera-Ghayouri, Lori-Ann Christie, Katherine S. Held, Veena Viswanath |
| ||Pharmaceutical Research. 2019; 36(4) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Glaucoma: Current treatment and impact of advanced drug delivery systems
| ||Khushwant S. Yadav, Rahul Rajpurohit, Sushmita Sharma |
| ||Life Sciences. 2019; 221: 362 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
|| A comparative study on the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of bimatoprost/timolol and dorzolamide/timolol combinations in glaucoma patients
| ||Jothi, R., Ismail, A.M., Senthamarai, R., Pal, S. |
| || Indian Journal of Pharmacology. 2010; 42(6): 362-365 |