IPSIndian Journal of Pharmacology
Home  IPS  Feedback Subscribe Top cited articles Login 
Users Online : 4389 
Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Navigate Here
 » Next article
 » Previous article 
 » Table of Contents
Resource Links
 »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
 »  Article in PDF (664 KB)
 »  Citation Manager
 »  Access Statistics
 »  Reader Comments
 »  Email Alert *
 »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

In This Article
   Impact of smokin...
   Benefits of smok...
   Barriers to smok...
   Smoking cessatio...
   Pharmacological ...
   New agents and t...
   Cost effectivene...
   Predictors of su...
   The Indian scena...
   Magnitude of the...
   Cessation programmes
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded833    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


Year : 2006  |  Volume : 38  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 320-329

Pharmacotherapy of smoking cessation and the Indian scenario

Department of Pharmacology, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal-462 021. M.P., India

Date of Submission22-Dec-2005
Date of Decision24-Apr-2006
Date of Acceptance21-May-2006

Correspondence Address:
V K Yadav
Department of Pharmacology, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal-462 021. M.P.
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0253-7613.27699

Rights and Permissions


Tobacco smoking is a leading cause of preventable diseases and deaths, both in India and the rest of the world. Various effective methods are now available which can help a person to quit smoking. However, the awareness of such interventions and the will to implement them are lacking both among tobacco addicts and healthcare providers in India. This article reviews the various pharmacological interventions currently available, the Indian scenario with regard to smoking cessation and the impact of smokeless tobacco use.

Keywords: Bupropion, nicotine dependence, NRT.

How to cite this article:
Yadav V K. Pharmacotherapy of smoking cessation and the Indian scenario. Indian J Pharmacol 2006;38:320-9

How to cite this URL:
Yadav V K. Pharmacotherapy of smoking cessation and the Indian scenario. Indian J Pharmacol [serial online] 2006 [cited 2023 Feb 3];38:320-9. Available from: https://www.ijp-online.com/text.asp?2006/38/5/320/27699

  Introduction Top

There are over 3 billion cigarette smokers world wide, of which 112 million are in India. India is the third largest producer and consumer of tobacco in the world.[1] Morbidity and mortality is continuously on the rise, in the Indian population, from tobacco use. Besides cigarettes, Indians smoke 'bidis' (tobacco rolled inside tendu leaves). However, the use of smokeless tobacco like 'gutkha' (a chewable flavoured tobacco product) and 'khaini' (tobacco rubbed with lime and put in between the cheek and gums), almost equals cigarette/bidi smoking and is more prevalent among females (smoking: male 29.4%, female 2.5%; smokeless: male 28.3%, female 12.4%).[2]

  Impact of smoking on health Top

Tobacco smoke contains over 1,000 identifiable chemicals of which nicotine and tar are the most important. Nicotine in tobacco smoke is responsible for dependence and tar is linked to various cancers affecting the lungs, stomach, urinary bladder and kidneys.[3] Sufficient data exist, which links cigarette smoking to cardiovascular diseases such as coronary artery disease, hypertension, stroke and peripheral vascular disease.[4],[5],[6] Smoking is related to respiratory diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic bronchitis. It also worsens bronchial asthma[7] and increases the risk of cancer of the cervix, especially in women suffering from HPV infection.[8]

The risk of smokers developing tuberculosis is significantly high and is a point of concern for a developing country like India. Smokers face a 2-3 fold increased risk of developing influenza. So the influenza vaccine is recommended for heavy smokers.[9] Plasma fibrinogen level, which is an independent risk factor for cerebrovascular disease (CVD), remains high in smokers compared to non-smokers. The elevated fibrinogen remains high even for 15 years after a person quits smoking.[10] There is a bidirectional association between smoking and erectile dysfunction (ED). Smokers have a higher risk of ED than non-smokers and those with ED were found more likely to be smokers.[11] Smoking is also associated with hearing loss, as is evident from a meta analysis of 15 observational studies.[12] Smoking can cause Crohn's disease, but on the contrary some improvement is seen in the course of illness of ulcerative colitis.[13] Due to its antiestrogenic effect, cigarette smoking can induce early menopause and osteoporotic changes in women.[14] Women smokers (>35 years), on oral contraceptives, are more prone to thromboembolic disorders.[15]

  Benefits of smoking cessation Top

Timely intervention for smoking cessation not only reduces the risk of major diseases, but also modifies the clinical course and outcome of certain disorders. In smokers with Crohn's disease, stopping smoking saw a 65% reduction in the risk of relapse, which was of same magnitude as that of immunosuppressive treatment. Hence, smoking cessation was recommended as the primary therapeutic aim in such cases.[13] In a cohort study involving Canadian women, it was observed that the risk of lung cancer mortality among those who quit smoking before the age of 50 or in the previous 10 years, was significantly lower than that of current smokers.[16]

Stopping smoking is beneficial in lung cancer patients prior to surgery, while continued smoking at the time of operation met with poor prognosis.[17] Smoking after cancer diagnosis shortens survival time and increases the risk of recurrence and development of another primary tumour, reduces treatment efficacy and increases complications of treatment.[18] There can be potential interactions of smoking with antitumour therapy which might prove detrimental to surgery, radiation and most importantly chemotherapy.[19] Smoking cessation is the most effective intervention to reduce the risk and progression of COPD.[20] However, the increased airway epithelial and T cell apoptosis in COPD remains, despite smoking cessation, contributing to local inflammation.[21] Stopping smoking can improve erectile dysfunction in a large number of patients. The age and severity of erectile dysfunction, before stopping smoking, are inversely related to the chance of improvement.[22] Smoking is a well-known cause of atherogenesis and increased tendency towards thrombosis. A study found that even two weeks of smoking cessation greatly improves platelet aggregation and intra-platelet redox imbalance, thereby decreasing oxidative stress.[23]

  Barriers to smoking cessation therapy Top

The nature of nicotine dependence itself is the single most important factor affecting smoking cessation interventions. Even smoking a single cigarette can cause nicotine dependence.[24] Subjective well-being is a remarkable effect of nicotine on mood.[25] There is also reinforcement with each puff. Development of tolerance to the subjective effects of nicotine naturally increases the use of number of cigarettes smoked per day. The cause of tolerance is the avid, longer duration of the binding of exogenous nicotine to acetylcholine receptors, leading to down regulation of CNS ACh receptors, needing nicotine reinforcement to maintain the elated mood and thus causing dependence. In dependent smokers, low blood nicotine level produces typical craving and withdrawal symptoms such as irritability, anxiety, depression, restlessness, poor concentration, increased appetite, weight gain and insomnia, leading to 'negative reinforcement'.[26], [27] One of the reasons offered by smokers for not quitting is weight gain.[28] Weight gain after smoking cessation largely depends on genetic factors and occurs mostly due to an increase in subcutaneous body fat.[29] The actual mechanism of weight gain is not well understood, but the carriers of DRD2 A-1 minor allele exhibit a significant increase in the rewarding value of food, following abstinence from smoking.[30] Moderate calorie restriction produces a small but significant increase in smoking and dieting may actually increase smoking behaviour, which can interfere with attempts of smoking cessation.[31]

  Smoking cessation interventions - Guidelines and goals Top

The WHO expert committee on smoking control had formulated certain guidelines in 1979 which recommended the following.

  1. Non-smoking should be regarded as normal social behaviour and all actions which can promote the development of this attitude are taken into consideration.
  2. There should be a total prohibition of all forms of tobacco promotion.
  3. Promotion of the export of tobacco and tobacco products should be discouraged. Tobacco-growing and manufacturing industries should be progressively reduced in size as rapidly as possible.
  4. Governments should recognise the serious dangers for smokers in certain industrial occupations and develop special programmes to eradicate smoking from these industries, introducing legislation, where necessary. The synergy between smoking and certain occupations implies the need for careful monitoring in industries where toxic inhalation is a problem and indicates the need for research in this area.
  5. Upper limits should be established for appropriate emission products of cigarettes. These limits (currently for tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide) should be progressively lowered as rapidly as possible.[32] However, there still exists a big gap between the recommendations and the actual implementation by the respective governments.

As per the US Public Health service report, the aims of the smoking cessation treatment should be as follows:

  1. The achievement of long-term or permanent abstinence.
  2. Effective treatment should be offered to all tobacco users.
  3. There should be consistent identification, documentation and treatment of every tobacco user at each visit to the hospital.
  4. Brief tobacco dependence treatment is also effective and thus should be offered.
  5. A strong relationship exists between the intensity of tobacco dependence, counselling and its effectiveness.
  6. Practical counselling and social support, arranged outside of treatment, are helpful.
  7. Of all the effective pharmacotherapies, at least one of these medications should be prescribed in the absence of contraindications.
  8. Tobacco dependence treatments are cost effective and should be covered by health insurance plans.[33]

There are two types of interventions, namely non-pharmacological and pharmacological.

  Non-pharmacological interventions Top

Non-pharmacological interventions are important as they are cost effective and, when combined with pharmacological interventions, give better abstinence rates, even in resistant cases with frequent relapses.[34]

  1. Counselling by medical practitioners: In a study conducted at a Singapore General Hospital with 394 out-patients and 425 in-patients, it was found that 41% achieved immediate quit rates for counselling, compared to 36% for bupropion. This quit rate was sustained at 35% after 12 months of follow-up. A quit rate of 32% was achieved even with one-time in-patient counselling.[35] It is also recommended that child health care clinicians help parents quit smoking by counselling and prescribing medications.[36]
  2. Smoking cessation strategies delivered by nurses and support organisations: As compared to physicians, nurses and social workers are more in touch with the patients. The cessation strategies delivered by them can have a much better and wider impact. Considering the magnitude of the benefit, it is recommended that nurses and social workers receive formal training in all the currently available interventions for smoking cessation including follow-up.[37]
  3. Telephonic call back and follow-up: This is an effective way to monitor patients who undergo treatment for smoking cessation as it also provides the necessary motivation to continue abstinence. Active calls made within the first 3 months of quitting produce a higher quit rate even at 12 months.[38]
  4. Health education: The ill effects of smoking and its impact on the society and environment should be taught at school, at work places and to the various special sections of society, who are at risk, by way of lectures, seminars and symposiums. This will create an environment of opinion where smoking ceases to be socially acceptable and those who smoke can be persuaded to quit smoking.
  5. Heavy taxation on tobacco products: Levying heavy taxes on tobacco and tobacco products could result in a significant decrease in tobacco consumption.

  Pharmacological interventions Top

Various effective pharmacological methods of smoking cessation are now available and should be advised to all smokers in the absence of contraindications.[32]

(A) Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT): NRT is an effective treatment to reduce cravings associated with smoking cessation. The methods used in NRT do not produce the same peak levels of nicotine in the blood as seen with cigarettes and thus do not cause the same subjective effects. They, however, suppress the symptoms of nicotine withdrawal. Smokers can now shift their dependence to an alternative nicotine delivery system which can be gradually withdrawn.[39] Various formulations of NRT are available such as chewing gum, transdermal patch, inhalator, nasal spray, nicotine sublingual tablets and lozenges.[40]

  1. Chewing gum: This is available in 2 and 4 mg strengths. The nicotine is present in the form of a complex with methacrylic acid polymer (nicotine polacrilex). Individuals who smoke 20 or less cigarettes per day should start with the 2 mg strength gum, to be chewed slowly over 30 min when there is an urge to smoke. Those smoking more than 20 cigarettes per day, should use the 4 mg gum.
  2. Sublingual tablets: They are the equivalent of 2 mg nicotine as β cyclodextrin complex. The recommended dose is 1-2 tabs sublingually, increased to a maximum of 40 tabs daily if necessary, for at least 3 months. The dose should be gradually reduced and then withdrawn.
  3. Lozenges: They contain 1mg of nicotine (as tartrate). Lozenges are not suitable for individuals with strong dependence or those who failed to quit smoking with the aid of other NRT. The initial dose is one lozenge every 1-2 h, increasing up to a maximum of 25 lozenges daily. The treatment should continue for at least for three months after which it is gradually withdrawn.
  4. Adhesive transdermal patch: Transdermal patches are designed to be applied for 16 or 24 h and are available in different strengths, delivering 5-22 mg nicotine during the recommended wear time. One patch is to be applied daily to the hip, trunk or upper arm, usually beginning with the highest dose or with a dose determined by the previous daily consumption of cigarettes. A different site of application should be used each day, with several days gap before the patch is applied to the same area of skin. A gradual withdrawal is recommended by reducing the dose every 2-8 weeks.
  5. Nasal spray: The suggested initial dose for a nasal spray (500 µg per actuation) is one spray into each nostril, twice an hour, up to a maximum of 80 sprays daily for the first 8 weeks and reduced thereafter.
  6. Nicotine inhalator cartridges: They contain 10 mg nicotine for use in an inhaler. The initial dose is 6-16 cartridges per day for 12 weeks and reduced gradually over 6-12 weeks.

NRT should be reviewed if abstinence is not achieved in 3 months. The choice of formulation is based on the patient's preference, tolerance and previous treatment, if any. The transdermal patch is the easiest to use and compliance is the greatest with this route. However, local untoward effects such as itching and irritation may occur. The gum has an unpleasant taste initially and some people find chewing difficult. It requires frequent dosing and also causes jaw pain and soreness of the mouth. Nasal spray has a faster onset of action, but may cause local irritation. A lozenge has an advantage in that it can be sucked discretely. A nasal spray can cause irritation of the nose and eyes. An inhalator produces mouth and throat irritation. Combination therapy of various NRT can be used without any increase in significant adverse effects.[41]

NRT is usually continued for about 3 months before being withdrawn. Although manufacturers advise a gradual withdrawal, others have found that it offers no advantage and recommend abrupt withdrawal. NRT has also been advised for long-term use in patients who fear relapse if NRT is stopped or in those who have persistent withdrawal symptoms.

There are concerns over the use of NRT in patients with cardiovascular disease, but clinical experience and experiments show that NRT can be used with some precaution.[42] However, NRT use in cases of recent MI or arrhythmia is contraindicated.[43]

Nicotine is readily absorbed through the mucous membrane and skin. Bioavailability of oral nicotine is low due to extensive first pass metabolism. Nicotine is widely distributed, crosses the placenta and is found in breast milk. The elimination half life is about 1-2 h. Nicotine is metabolised, mainly in the liver via cytochrome P-450 isoenzyme CYP2A6 to cotinine and nicotine oxide. Nicotine and its metabolites are excreted in urine. Since CYP2A6 has a significant role in nicotine metabolism and population distribution of CYP2A6 alleles is important as it can affect the dependence trend in various ethnic groups.[44]

Craving intensity follows the circadian rhythm with the lowest intensity in the morning and peak intensity on the evening. Nicotine delivered via the patch had no impact on these circadian variations. These observations suggest that craving and withdrawal symptoms may be sustained by different physiological pathways and only selected components of cigarettes are influenced by NRT.[45] Using a higher dose of transdermal nicotine than usual can reduce the craving and decrease the number of cigarettes smoked per day, even in heavy smokers.[46]

(B) Bupropion hydrochloride: Bupropion hydrochloride is given as a modified release preparation (Bupropion SR), as an aid to smoking cessation, in an initial dose of 150 mg once daily for 6 days, increasing to twice daily on Day 7. The maximum recommended dose for patients with predisposing risk factors for seizure is 150 mg per day. Treatment should be started one week before the patient attempts to stop smoking, to allow steady state blood levels of bupropion to be reached, and is normally continued for 7-12 weeks. If there is no significant progress towards smoking abstinence by the 7th week, then the therapy should be stopped.

Bupropion is well absorbed from GIT, but may undergo extensive first pass metabolism. Several metabolites are pharmacologically active and have longer plasma half life and achieve greater plasma concentration than the parent compound. Bupropion is metabolised through CYP2B6 and hydroxyl bupropion is the active metabolite, with comparable potency as the parent compound. Several different CYP enzymes are likely to be involved to a clinically significant degree in the biotransformation of bupropion. In vitro drug metabolism studies have shown that several different CYP enzymes (i.e., CYP2B6, 3A4, 2A6, 2E1 and 1A2) can mediate the biotransformation of bupropion.[47]

Metabolites are excreted in urine, and less than 1% of the parent drug is excreted unchanged. Bupropion and its metabolite cross the placenta and are distributed in breast milk.[48] No significant differences between smokers and non-smokers or between male and female volunteers were seen for bupropion pharmacokinetics. Hence, there is no need for dosage adjustment with respect to gender.[49]

The mechanism of action of bupropion in smoking cessation is not clear, but may involve central adrenergic and dopaminergic systems.[50] In an experiment, two subcutaneous injections of nicotine to rats, on post-natal days 14-15, significantly enhanced the magnitude of functional responses in the hippocampal region, arising from the upregulation of type II and type III nACh receptors. This upregulation could be an important signal in nicotine addiction which is effectively blocked by bupropion.[51]

The A1 allele of the dopaminergic D 2 receptor gene (DRD2) is associated with a reduced number of dopaminergic binding sites in the brain and with the increased likelihood of substance abuse and addictive behaviour. Women with at least one A1 allele will stop taking bupropion due to its side effects. This variation is not seen in men.[52]

The side effects of bupropion include agitation, anxiety and insomnia. Other less frequently reported side effects are fever, dry mouth, headache or migraine, nausea, vomiting, tremors, sweating and skin rashes. Tachycardia, chest pain and hypertension (sometimes, severe) and occasional postural hypotension have been reported.

Seizures, which are partially dose related, are particularly noted in patients with anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa and patients with past history of seizure disorder. Over all, seizure risk is 0.1-0.4%.[53]

Bupropion should not be given with MAO inhibitors. Its use, along with nicotine transdermal patches, has been associated with hypertension. Bupropion is also an inhibitor of CYP2D6 and drugs metabolised by this enzyme should be given carefully, for instance, beta blockers. Prescribers should reconsider the dose of bupropion when starting or stopping a CYP enzyme inducer or inhibitor, for instance, fluoxetine, carbamazepine, since such an action could change the clearance of bupropion and/or one or more of its metabolites.[54] Bupropion does not increase the rate of major malformation in foetuses above the baseline. However, a higher rate of spontaneous abortions are similar to the other studies examining the safety of antidepressants in pregnancy.[55] Bupropion is effective for smoking cessation during pregnancy.[56]

  New agents and therapeutic adjuncts Top

1. Rimonabant (SR 141716): Rimonabant is a selective cannabinoid receptor antagonist which blocks the CB-1 receptor. In animal studies, it has shown beneficial effects in treating obesity, smoking cessation[57] and metabolic syndrome. In human studies, rimonabant has been effective in the treatment of obesity and smoking cessation. To date only nausea is reported to be greater than placebo.[58]

Rimonabant also participates in the regulation of the impaired endocannabinoid system and reduces nicotine self administration.[59] In animal experiments involving rat models, cues which maintain nicotine seeking behaviour several weeks after withdrawal is reversed by rimonabant, suggesting that it is not only effective in smoking cessation, but also capable of maintaining abstinence.[60]

2. Nicotine vaccine: Currently under Phase II trials, the nicotine vaccine acts by inducing nicotine specific antibodies which can combine with nicotine in the blood and prevent nicotine's entry into the brain, thereby reducing its addictive potential and preventing a relapse following smoking cessation.[61]

3. Topiramate: It is an AMPA/kainite antagonist and thus could be of value in the treatment of addiction. A small study, comprising 13 subjects, has shown this agent of some value in the pharmacotherapy of smoking cessation.[62]

4. Varenicline: Varenicline tartarate is a selective nicotinic receptor, partial agonist. A multicentre phase II double blind trial compared varenicline with placebo and bupropion with placebo as control. The results were comparable for both the drugs in terms of efficacy and tolerability.[63] Varenicline could provide a new approach in the pharmacotherapy of smoking cessation.

5. Nortriptyline: Nortriptyline is the main active metabolite of amitriptyline, with longer t˝ than the parent compound. Nortriptyline undergoes extensive first pass metabolism in the liver to active compound 10 hydroxy nortriptyline. In a meta analysis of 5 trials, comprising 861 smokers, it was concluded that with nortriptyline higher prolonged abstinence rates were seen at 6 months as compared to the placebo (RR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.7 to 3.6; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.15). The drug was well tolerated and its use as a first line agent in smoking cessation is recommended, considering its efficacy and low cost.[64],[65],[66] One randomised trial evaluated the efficacy of nortriptyline combined with nicotine transdermal patch to a placebo. The cessation rates were 23% (n = 79) and 10% (n = 79), respectively (absolute difference 13%, 95% CI 1.3 to 24.5% p = 0.52). Most frequent adverse effects were dry mouth (38%) and sedation (20%). There was no significant effect on withdrawal symptoms.[67]

6. Glucose tabs: Single doses of nicotine relieve hunger in smokers and hunger pangs, sometimes, are associated with a craving for cigarettes. The adaptation to long-term nicotine intake leads to the exacerbation of these sensations during periods of abstinence. A placebo-controlled study has shown that glucose tablets increase one month abstinence rates significantly when compared to placebo. The low cost of glucose tablets can make it a useful adjunct in smoking cessation treatment.[68]

7. Mecamylamine: It is a nicotine antagonist and may block the rewarding effect of nicotine, thereby reducing the urge to smoke. In a study of 48 volunteers, a combination of mecamylamine with the nicotine patch was found more effective than the nicotine patch alone (abstinence rate at one year was 37.5% Vs . 4.2%). Another study of 80 volunteers compared mecamylamine alone with nicotine alone. The combination of mecamylamine with nicotine and the placebo showed a highest abstinence rate of 40% and statistically significant benefit with mecamylamine, using the Kaplan Meir survival analysis. Mecamylamine was well tolerated and only dose reduction was required in 40% of the subjects because of constipation.[69]

8. D 3 receptor ligands: Pharmacological and behavioural evidence implicates dopamine D 3 receptors in the mechanisms underlying stimulus controlled drug seeking behaviour. BP 897 (a D 3 receptor partial agonist) and ST 198 (a D 3 receptor antagonist) have been shown, in animal experiments, to reduce the motivational effects of mechanisms distinct from those of NRT and bupropion. These findings suggest that D 3 receptor ligands would be selective for rewarding and reinforcing the effects of nicotine which contribute to tobacco smoking behaviour, without affecting subjective responses to nicotine or producing any antidepressant-like effect.[70]

9. Tryptophan and high carbohydrate diet: Serotonin enhancing substances such as tryptophan and high carbohydrate diets have been shown to reduce the negative effect, which is also a classic symptom of withdrawal. In a randomised trial comparing tryptophan (n=16) with the placebo (n=15), the former group smoked fewer cigarettes daily. Reported anxiety and other withdrawal symptoms were lower in the tryptophan group as compared to the placebo group.[71] Thus, tryptophan and high carbohydrate diet could become an important adjuvant in smoking cessation therapy. However, more trials involving a larger number of patients and standard treatment are required.

  Cost effectiveness of various therapies Top

A study conducted by Javitz et al, shows that the cost per life year and quality adjusted life year saved were sufficiently low for 300 and 150 mg doses of bupropion and are among the most cost effective of life saving medical treatments. Bupropion 150 mg, combined with either proactive telephone calls or tailored mailing, was the most cost effective regimen.[34] A cost benefit analysis by Neilson et al , comparing bupropion 300 mg with the nicotine patch, concluded that bupropion 300 mg/day for 9 weeks is a more cost beneficial smoking cessation intervention than the nicotine patch.[32] Data on the cost effectiveness of other pharmacological measures are currently not available.

  Predictors of success in smoking cessation interventions Top

Successful treatment depends on the individual, social, demographic and genetic factors. Education is a strong socio-epidemiologic predictor of smoking cessation. Effectiveness of smoking cessation therapy can be measured from a decrease in the number of cigarettes smoked per day, Fagerstrm questionnaire, carbon monoxide measure in expired air, measurements of thiocyanates and cotinine (metabolite of nicotine) in biological fluids. However, urinary cotinine level measurement is most useful for the follow-up of smoking cessation.[72] In one study, only 6% of smokers with less than a high school degree quit smoking during a 4 year-study period in comparison to 17% smokers with high school education and 28% of smokers with at least a college degree.[73] Sometimes, it is argued that by increasing the prices of cigarettes, smokers can be forced to at least cut down on the number of cigarettes smoked per day. But a survey conducted among 3,602 smokers in the US suggested that most smokers are price sensitive and seek out measures to purchase less expensive cigarettes.[74]

The CYP2B6 gene has been implicated in the biotransformation of both bupropion and nicotine. Smokers on bupropion with decreased activity CYP2B6 variant are more vulnerable to abstinence symptoms such as cravings and relapse easily. However, in females, bupropion may attenuate this genotype effect.[75] A relapse is more likely seen in smokers with strong nicotine dependence and, in such cases, a combination of nicotine and bupropion along with counselling can achieve higher abstinence rates.[76]

Sleep disturbance is a regular feature of smoking abstinence, which may be in the form of frequent arousal with negative day-time consequences and dysphoric moods. Sleeplessness can disturb sympathetic activity and cause cardiovascular and CNS changes. These changes could be the cause of a relapse seen following NRT and bupropion treatment, especially in women.[77]

Mentally ill patients smoke twice as much as other patients. There is evidence that smoking cessation among psychiatric patients is more difficult to achieve than other patients and thus special strategies such as forceful smoking prohibition might be necessary along with pharmacotherapy.[78] Achieving smoking cessation in depressed women is also quite challenging because quitting is difficult during certain phases of the menstrual cycle, which are also associated with a greater level of dysphoria. These women are also less likely to seek medical attention for smoking cessation.[79]

COPD patients show a similar efficacy and adverse effect profile with various pharmacological interventions as in smokers without the disease. However, efficacy seems to depend on the follow-up period used to define the success, as the abstinence rate declined with longer follow-up.[80]

A cross-sectional study of smokers, who attended a smoking cessation clinic for combined medical and cognitive behavioural group therapy, showed that smokers who fully comply with the treatment and abstain during the first week are more likely to remain abstinent even after 6 months.[81]

The pharmacokinetic disposition of various forms of NRT contributes to the success rate of this form of treatment. The nicotine in a cigarette is absorbed from the pulmonary venous blood and reaches the brain in 10-20 sec and produces positive effects on mood and cognition. These positive effects contribute to addiction. Compared to tobacco smoking, only a few reinforcing effects are seen with NRT as with most of them, the delivery and rise in blood nicotine level is slower than with smoking. These differences in pharmacokinetics explain why some patients find it difficult to quit smoking even after using NRT.[82] In such patients, a combination of NRT with other pharmacologic therapies or a higher dose of NRT can be used.

Nicotine is inactivated to cotinine mainly by CYP2A6 which mediates 90% of this conversion. Some studies suggest that the CYP2A6 gene polymorphism can exert a differential effect on nicotine kinetics during various stages of smoking such as initiation, conversion to dependence, amount smoked during dependence and quitting.[83]

Depressed patients, in euthymic state maintained on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRIs), can be given bupropion to prevent the relapse of smoking following cessation. There is also an improvement seen in the SSRI associated sexual dysfunction.[84] Bupropion is very effective in relapsed smokers too. An open multicentre study examined 321 patients who had relapsed after a smoking cessation attempt with bupropion SR or NRT. They were given bupropion SR (300 mg/day) lasting 7 weeks with an initial run in of 150 mg/day for the first 3 days. Motivational counselling was also provided. The continuous abstinence rates for week 4-7 were 29.6% and the point prevalence rates for week 26 were 30.5%. Patients who relapsed had reduced their daily consumption to nearly one-third.[85]

There are conflicting reports of the different response to bupropion among males and females.[86] Meta analysis of data from 4,421 participants in 12 randomised smoking cessation trials of bupropion SR 300 mg Vs. placebo, showed the former as an effective cessation aid in women (OR = 2.47, 95% CI = 1.92 to 3.17) with no gender specific response. However, women were less successful at quitting than men, regardless of the treatment.[87] The reason for this could be the fear of weight gain. Dietary interventions plus nicotine gum showed an increase in the success rate in terms of smoking cessation and prevention of weight gain.[29],[88] Weight gain after smoking cessation is not dependent on obesity or drug taken. Further, a beneficial lipid profile was seen with both bupropion and NRT, in obese and lean subjects.[85]

A randomised trial, involving 1,524 adult smokers willing to quit, evaluated the effectiveness of bupropion SR. A significantly (P=0.005) higher rate of non-smoking was observed in those receiving a larger dose of 300 mg, but with a slight increase in symptoms such as difficulty in sleeping, difficulty in concentration, tremors and gastrointestinal problems with decreased craving (P=0.001). Thus, bupropion can be safely given, in a higher dose of 300 mg, when better results of smoking cessation therapy are expected.[89]

A double blind randomised trial, involving 244 current smokers, observed that the achievement of 1 year quit rate as validated by saliva cotinine or spousal proxy, was not significant with bupropion as compared with placebo (19% bupropion group Vs. 24% for placebo, P=0.36).[90] Thus, while commenting on a particular intervention, it is always prudent to concentrate on the achievement of the long-term quit rate. Low levels of nicotine dependence, high motivation, absence of smoking related diseases, long duration of previous quit attempts, male gender, low levels of current alcohol problems and marital status are strong predictors of the successful outcome of smoking cessation treatment.[91] A change in the quality of cigarettes can lower the number of cigarettes smoked per day such as the switch from plain to filtered ones which deliver low tar and nicotine.[92]

  The Indian scenario of smoking cessation interventions Top

Surveys conducted in 2000 indicate that India has more than 184 million tobacco users. In India, tobacco is used not only in cigarettes and 'bidis,' but a great majority use tobacco in non-smoking forms such as 'gutkha' and 'khaini'.The direct consequence of these non-smoking forms of tobacco is oral cancer, which accounts for nearly 1, 60, 000 cases annually. As per the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), 4.5 million people develop angina or other heart diseases and 3.9 million develop COPD as a result of tobacco use. According to the WHO, by 2020 tobacco will be solely responsible for 13.3% of all deaths in India.[93]

  Magnitude of the tobacco problem in India Top

The pattern of tobacco use greatly varies between the urban and rural population. The consumption of tobacco and tobacco products is more among the rural population and currently shows an upward trend in females in both groups. [Table - 1] Literacy and living status also affect the tobacco abuse pattern. [Table - 2]

The Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003.

This act (then bill) was first introduced in the parliament on March 7, 2001.[94] It was reintroduced in 2003 and passed by the Rajya Sabha on April 9, 2003 and in the Lok Sabha on April 30, 2003. It became an Act on May 18, 2003 after receiving the Presidential assent. The salient features of the Act include:

  1. Prohibition of smoking in a public place.
  2. Prohibition of advertising (direct and indirect) of cigarettes and other tobacco products.
  3. Prohibition of sale of any tobacco products to minors and in an area within a radius of 100 yards of any educational institution.
  4. Restrictions on trade and commerce in, and production, supply and distribution of cigarettes and other tobacco products.

The rules under the cigarettes and other tobacco products Act, 2003 are in the process of being formulated.

  Cessation programmes Top

There are two types of cessation programmes currently in operation.[95]

a. Clinic based: There are 13 smoking cessation clinics across India, to provide counselling, psychosocial support and pharmacotherapy for all tobacco users who want to quit the habit. A scientific approach is adopted at these clinics, while treatment and data regarding the use of tobacco is meticulously maintained for further reference.

b. Community interventions: There are various NGOs working on tobacco related issues, including the implementation of government directives and prevention of use of tobacco products by adults and children.

Awareness among physicians is lacking regarding smoking cessation interventions available today. Physicians normally advise smoking cessation only when patients have severe bronchitis, COPD and pulmonary tuberculosis. Counselling for smokers who are otherwise healthy is generally lacking.

India is a developing country with most of the population belonging to the low socio-economic strata. Tuberculosis is rampant among this population and the government has been spending millions of rupees on tuberculosis control programmes. Quitting smoking and even reducing it could be an effective measure in the control of tuberculosis, since smoking directly and indirectly (through passive smoking) affects the course of this devastating disease.[96]

  Conclusion Top

Both NRT and bupropion are effective and established pharmacotherapies for smoking cessation. Benefit risk assessment, assuming a 30% one year quit rate, demonstrates that for every 10,000 smokers treated with bupropion SR, 19 lives are saved and 86 cases of smoking attributed morbidity are averted in a 5 year period, while the risk of experiencing severe adverse events (seizure, hypersensitivity) is 0.22%.[97]

The role of willingness to quit cannot be undermined. It is seen that bupropion may be more effective as an antismoking treatment in people who are motivated to quit because low doses of bupropion produce a nicotine-like effect that serves as a suitable substitute.[98] The choice of the NRT to be used depends on comorbid conditions, previous use and the need for rapid delivery of NRT. In highly dependent patients, measures delivering a higher dose of nicotine, such as a nasal spray or an inhaler, would be preferred. Also, in such subjects a combination of bupropion with NRT is recommended, but there is some risk of hypertension with this combination. Patients should be warned and examined before-hand and there should be suitable follow-up. The most important aim of any intervention for smoking cessation should be the prevention of a relapse after successful therapy. A return to smoking after 1-2 weeks of abstinence is very common, which is more so in previously depressed patients or patients dependent on alcohol.[99] There is an increase in depressive symptoms after abstinence, prompting resumption. Bupropion is effective in such patients and it also effectively abolishes nicotine withdrawal symptoms.[100]

Some studies, however, recommend NRT as the first line therapy for smoking cessation because of the amphetamine-like nature of bupropion, with some structural similarities, and similar side effects such as suppression of appetite, insomnia, weight loss and hypertension.[101] But several other studies claim that bupropion is a safe and efficacious drug[97],[102],[103],[104] and should be prescribed with consideration, especially to patients with hypertension. Study on self-administered treatment for smoking cessation revealed that self-help manuals do increase quit rates when combined with individualised adjuncts such as written feedback and telephonic counselling. It is also difficult to evaluate the efficacy of NRT and bupropion when self-administered. It is predicted that though they increase the initial quit rate, in the long-term, there is poor compliance and early discontinuation.[105] Counselling is an effective and cost-effective method for smoking cessation, but counselling alone may not be useful for chronic smokers and its effectiveness can be improved by simultaneous pharmacotherapy.

Other strategies such as low tar filter cigarettes to reduce cancer risk are clearly ineffective and should be discouraged.[106] Physicians are in a unique position to advise patients, who smoke, about the ill effects of smoking. The use of smokeless forms of tobacco affect the individual in the form of oral cancers, but a smoker pollutes his environment, putting at risk not just himself but other people too. Thus, a ban on public smoking should be strictly enforced with heavy penalties.

The tobacco industry is a multibillion-dollar industry, which provides revenue to the government. It is difficult to compensate for the loss that would befall the industry, following a complete ban. Jobs are also at stake. Thus, most governments adopt a balancing act policy of imposing stricter laws over the use of tobacco products, on the one hand, while patronising tobacco industries on the other.

In India, a large part of the tobacco industry is engaged in bidi-making, which enjoys the status of a cottage industry and draws incentives from the government. This is in direct contradiction to the recommendation of the WHO expert committee on smoking control, which recommends the discouragement of the development of tobacco and tobacco related industries.[32] Therefore, effective intervention lies in educating the masses about the ill effects of the tobacco use right from the school level, to prevent the youth from adopting this harmful habit. Physicians, nurses and primary healthcare workers should also accept their responsibility and counsel their patients. The government should encourage antitobacco strategies such as increasing the price of cigarettes and other tobacco products, while limiting their availability, albeit at the risk of losing revenue. But this loss of revenue would be much less when compared to the costs incurred on the treatment of tobacco related diseases. Only a concerted effort could realise the dream of a tobacco-free world.

  References Top

1.Murthy NS, Mathew A. Cancer epidemiology and prevention. Curr Sci Vol 2004;86:4.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ORC Macro, National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2) 1998-99. India, Mumbai: IIPS; 2002.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Hunt JD, van der Hel OL, McMillan GP, Boffetta P, Brennan P. Renal cell carcinoma in relation to cigarette smoking: Meta-analysis of 24 studies. Int J Cancer 2005;114:101-8.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
4.Dagenais GR, Yi Q, Lonn E, Sleight P, Ostergren J, Yusuf S. Impact of cigarette smoking in high-risk patients participating in a clinical trial. A substudy from the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) trial. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2005;12:75-81.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Gupta R, Gurm H, Bartholomew JR. Smokeless tobacco and cardiovascular risk. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1845-9.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
6.Abdenbi K. Smoking cessation in coronary patients. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) 2002;51:357-66.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  
7.Lemiere C, Boulet LP. Cigarette smoking and asthma: A dangerous mix. Can Respir J 2005;12:79-80.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  
8.Boardman LA, Cooper AS, Clark M, Weitzen S, Whiteley JA, Peipert JF. HPV, cervical neoplasia and smoking: knowledge among colposcopy patients. J Reprod Med 2004;49:965-72.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  
9.Arcavi L, Benowitz NL. Cigarette smoking and infection. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2206-16.  Back to cited text no. 9  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
10.Sinha S, Luben RN, Welch A, Bingham S, Wareham NJ, Day NE, et al . Fibrinogen and cigarette smoking in men and women in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer in Norfolk (EPIC-Norfolk) population. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2005;12:144-50.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Shiri R, Hakama M, Hakkinen J, Tammela TL, Auvinen A, Koskimaki J. Relationship between smoking and erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 2005;17:164-9.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Nomura K, Nakao M, Morimoto T. Effect of smoking on hearing loss: quality assessment and meta-analysis. Prev Med 2005;40:138-44.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Johnson GJ, Cosnes J, Mansfield JC. Smoking cessation as primary therapy to modify the course of Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005;21:921-31.  Back to cited text no. 13  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
14.Frank E. Benefits of stopping smoking. West J Med 1993;159:83-87.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Castelli WP. Cardiovascular Disease: Pathogenesis, epidemiology and risk among users of oral contraceptives who smoke. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:349-56.   Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Zhang B, Ferrence R, Cohen J, Bondy S, Ashley MJ, Rehm J, et al . Smoking cessation and lung cancer mortality in a cohort of middle-aged Canadian women. Ann Epidemiol 2005;15:302-9.   Back to cited text no. 16    
17.Sardari Nia P, Weyler J, Colpaert C, Vermeulen P, Van Marck E, Van Schil P. Prognostic value of smoking status in operated non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2005;47:351-9.  Back to cited text no. 17    
18.Schnoll RA, Malstrom M, James C, Rothman RL, Miller SM, Ridge JA, et al . Correlates of tobacco use among smokers and recent quitters diagnosed with cancer. Patient Educ Couns 2002;46:137-45.  Back to cited text no. 18    
19.Dresler CM. Is it more important to quit smoking than which chemotherapy is used? Lung Cancer 2003;39:119-24.  Back to cited text no. 19    
20.Wagena EJ, Zeegers MP, van Schayck CP, Wouters EF. Benefits and risks of pharmacological smoking cessation therapies in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Drug Saf 2003;26:381-403.  Back to cited text no. 20    
21.Hodge S, Hodge G, Holmes M, Reynolds PN. Increased airway epithelial and T-cell apoptosis in COPD remains despite smoking cessation. Eur Respir J 2005;25:447-54.  Back to cited text no. 21    
22.Pourmand G, Alidaee MR, Rasuli S, Maleki A, Mehrsai A. Do cigarette smokers with erectile dysfunction benefit from stopping?: A prospective study. BJU Int 2004;94:1310-3.  Back to cited text no. 22    
23.Morita H, Ikeda H, Haramaki N, Eguchi H, Imaizumi T. Only two-week smoking cessation improves platelet aggregability and intraplatelet redox imbalance of long-term smokers. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:589-94.  Back to cited text no. 23    
24.Anthony JC, Warner LA, Kessler RC. Comparative epidemiology of dependence on tobacco, alcohol, controlled substances, and inhalants: basic findings from the comorbidity survey. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 1994:2:244-268.  Back to cited text no. 24    
25.Benovitz NL. Pharmacology of nicotine: addiction and therapeutics. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1996:36:597-613.  Back to cited text no. 25    
26.Keenan RM. Pharmacodynamic effects of cotinine in abstinent cigarette smoker. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1994;55:581-90.  Back to cited text no. 26    
27.Slade J. Nicotine and addiction: The Brown and Williams documents. JAMA 1995;274:225-33.  Back to cited text no. 27    
28.Sepinwall D, Borrelli B. Older. Medically ill smokers are concerned about weight gain after quitting smoking. Addict Behav 2004;29:1809-19.  Back to cited text no. 28    
29.Filozof C, Fernandez Pinilla MC, Fernandez-Cruz A. Smoking cessation and weight gain. Obes Rev 2004;5:95-103.  Back to cited text no. 29    
30.Lerman C, Berrettini W, Pinto A, Patterson F, Crystal-Mansour S, Wileyto EP, et al . Changes in food reward following smoking cessation: A pharmacogenetic investigation. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 2004:174:571-7.   Back to cited text no. 30    
31.Cheskin LJ, Hess JM, Henningfield J, Gorelick DA. Calorie restriction increases cigarette use in adult smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2005;179:430-6.  Back to cited text no. 31    
32.World Health Organisation: Controlling the smoking epidemic: report of the WHO expert committee on smoking control. Geneva: WHO; 1979.  Back to cited text no. 32    
33.A clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence: A US Public Health Service report. The Tobacco Use and Dependence Clinical Practice . JAMA 2000;283:3244-54.  Back to cited text no. 33    
34.Javitz HS, Swan GE, Zbikowski SM, Curry SJ, McAfee TA, Decker DL, et al . Cost-effectiveness of different combinations of bupropion SR dose and behavioural treatment for smoking cessation: a societal perspective. Am J Manag Care 2004;10:187-8.  Back to cited text no. 34    
35.Zow HC, Hsu AA, Eng PC. Smoking cessation programme: the Singapore General Hospital experience. Singapore Med J 2004;45:430-4.  Back to cited text no. 35    
36.Winickoff JP, Tanski SE, McMillen RC, Klein JD, Rigotti NA, Weitzman M. Child health care clinicians' use of medications to help parents quit smoking: A national parent survey. Pediatrics 2005;115:1013-7.  Back to cited text no. 36    
37.Johnston JM, Chan SS, Chan SK, Lam TH, Chi I, Leung GM. Training nurses and social workers in smoking cessation counselling: a population needs assessment in Hong Kong. Prev Med 2005;40:389-406.  Back to cited text no. 37    
38.Litt J. What's new in smoking cessation? Aust Prescr 2005;28:73-5.   Back to cited text no. 38    
39.Goodman and Gillman's. The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 11ed New York: Mc Graw Hills; 2005.  Back to cited text no. 39    
40.Sean C Sweetman, editor. Martin dale. The complete drug reference. 33 ed. UK: Pharmaceutical press; 2002.  Back to cited text no. 40    
41.Rigotti NA. Treatment of tobacco use and dependence. NEJM 2002;346:7: 506-12.  Back to cited text no. 41    
42.Joseph AM, Fu SS. Safety issues in pharmacotherapy for smoking in patients with cardiovascular disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2003;45: 429-41.  Back to cited text no. 42    
43.Najem B, Houssiere A, Pathak A, Janssen C, Lemogoum D, Xhaet O, et al . Acute cardiovascular and sympathetic effects of nicotine replacement therapy. Hypertension 2006;47:1162-7.  Back to cited text no. 43    
44.Hukkanen J, Jacob P 3rd, Benowitz NL. Metabolism and disposition kinetics of nicotine. Pharmacol Rev 2005;57:79-115.  Back to cited text no. 44    
45.Teneggi V, Tiffany ST, Squassante L, Milleri S, Ziviani L, Bye A. Smokers deprived of cigarettes for 72 h: Effect of nicotine patches on craving and withdrawal. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2002;164:177-87.  Back to cited text no. 45    
46.Benowitz NL, Zevin S, Jacob P. Suppression of nicotine intake during ad libitum cigarette smoking by high-dose transdermal nicotine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1998;287:958-62.  Back to cited text no. 46    
47.Wurm RM, Dunn JA, Silver I, Patel DK. In vitro metabolism of bupropion by human liver microsomes and cDNA expressed human cytochrome P450s. Proceedings of the international society for the study of xenobiotics 1996;10:371.   Back to cited text no. 47    
48.Sweet RA. Pharmacokinetics of single and multiple dose of bupropion in elderly patients with depression. J Clin Pharmacol 1995;35:876-84.  Back to cited text no. 48    
49.Hsyu PH, Singh A, Giargiari TD, Dunn JA, Ascher JA, Johnston JA. Pharmacokinetics of bupropion and its metabolites in cigarette smokers versus nonsmokers. J Clin Pharmacol 1997;37:737-43.  Back to cited text no. 49    
50.Glaxo Wellcome Inc. Physicians desk reference. 52nd ed. Montvale, NJ: Medical economics Co.; 1998.  Back to cited text no. 50    
51.Alkondon M, Albuquerque EX. Nicotinic receptor subtypes in rat hippocampal slices are differentially sensitive to desensitization and early in vivo functional up-regulation by nicotine and to block by bupropion. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2005;313:740-50.  Back to cited text no. 51    
52.Swan GE, Valdes AM, Ring HZ, Khroyan TV, Jack LM, Ton CC, et al . Dopamine receptor DRD2 genotype and smoking cessation outcome following treatment with bupropion SR. Pharmacogenomics J 2005;5:21-9.  Back to cited text no. 52    
53.mhra.gov.uk [home page on the internet]. UK. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency copyright 2006. Message from professor A Breckenridge CEM/CMO/2001/7. Available from: http://www.mhra.gov.uk  Back to cited text no. 53    
54.Preskorn.com [home page on the internet] columns published by Sheldon H Preskorn copyright 2006. Out patient management of depression table 7.8. Available from: http://www.preskorn.com/columns/0001.html  Back to cited text no. 54    
55.Chun-Fai-Chan B, Koren G, Fayez I, Kalra S, Voyer-Lavigne S, Boshier A, et al . Pregnancy outcome of women exposed to bupropion during pregnancy: A prospective comparative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:932-6.  Back to cited text no. 55    
56.Chan B, Einarson A, Koren G. Effectiveness of bupropion for smoking cessation during pregnancy. J Addict Dis 2005;24:19-23.  Back to cited text no. 56    
57.Mansourati J, Borel ML, Munier S, Guevel- Jointnet AL. Medications in smoking cessation. Presse Med 2005;34:1331-6.  Back to cited text no. 57    
58.Boyd ST, Fremming BA. Rimonabant-A Selective CB1 Antagonist. Ann Pharmacother 2005;39:684-90.  Back to cited text no. 58    
59.Kvasnicka T. Endocannabinoids-the new option in the treatment of metabolic syndrome and in smoking cessation. Cas Lek Cesk 2005;144:81-4;  Back to cited text no. 59    
60.Cohen C, Perrault G, Griebel G, Soubrie P. Nicotine-associated cues maintain nicotine-seeking behavior in rats several weeks after nicotine withdrawal: Reversal by the cannabinoid (CB1) receptor antagonist, rimonabant (SR141716). Neuropsychopharmacology 2005;30:145-55.  Back to cited text no. 60    
61.Maurer P, Bachmann MF. Therapeutic vaccines for nicotine dependence. Curr Opin Mol Ther 2006;8:11-6.  Back to cited text no. 61    
62.Khazaal Y, Cornuz J, Bilancioni R, Zullino DF. Topiramate for smoking cessation. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2006;60:384-8.  Back to cited text no. 62    
63.Nides M, Onken C, Gonzales D, Rennard S, Watsky EJ, Anziano R, et al . Smoking cessation varenicline, a selective alfa 4 beta 2 nicotinic receptor partial agonist: Results from a 7 week, randomized, placebo- and bupropion- controlled trial with 1-year follow up. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1561-8.   Back to cited text no. 63    
64.Wagena EJ, Knipschild P, Zeegers MP. Should nortriptyline be used as a first-line aid to help smokers quit? Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction 2005;100:317-26.  Back to cited text no. 64    
65.Dickerson LM, Carek PJ. Nortriptyline effective for smoking cessation. J Fam Pract 2002;51:1008.  Back to cited text no. 65    
66.Wagena EJ, Knipschild P, Zeegers MP. Should nortriptyline be used as a first-line aid to help smokers quit? Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction 2005;100:317-26.  Back to cited text no. 66    
67.Prochazka AV, Kick S, Steinbrunn C, Miyoshi T, Fryer GE. A randomized trial of nortriptyline combined with transdermal nicotine for smoking cessation. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2229-33.  Back to cited text no. 67    
68.West R. Glucose for smoking cessation: does it have a role? CNS Drugs 2001;15:261-5.  Back to cited text no. 68    
69.Lancaster T, Stead LF. Mecamylamine (a nicotine antagonist) for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;2:CD001009.  Back to cited text no. 69    
70.Le Foll B, Sokoloff P, Stark H, Goldberg SR. Dopamine D3 receptor ligands block nicotine-induced conditioned place preferences through a mechanism that does not involve discriminative-stimulus or antidepressant-like effects. Neuropsychopharmacology 2005;30:720-30.  Back to cited text no. 70    
71.Bowen DJ, Spring B, Fox E. Tryptophan and high-carbohydrate diets as adjuncts to smoking cessation therapy. J Behav Med 1991;14:97-110.  Back to cited text no. 71    
72.Berny C, Boyer JC, Capolaghi B, L'Homme GD, Desch G, Garelik D, et al . Biomarkers of tobacco smoke exposure. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 2002;60: 263-72.   Back to cited text no. 72    
73.Wetter DW, Cofta-Gunn L, Irvin JE, Fouladi RT, Wright K, Daza P, et al . What accounts for the association of education and smoking cessation? : Prev Med 2005;40:452-60.  Back to cited text no. 73    
74.Hyland A, Bauer JE, Li Q, Abrams SM, Higbee C, Peppone L, et al . Higher cigarette prices influence cigarette purchase patterns. Tob Control 2005;14:86-92.  Back to cited text no. 74    
75.Lerman C, Sheilds PG, Wileyto EP, Andrain J, PintoA, HawkL, et al . Pharmacogenetic investigation of smoking cessation treatrment. Pharmacogenetics 2002;2:627-34.  Back to cited text no. 75    
76.Chatkin JM, Mariante de Abreu C, Haggstram FM, Wagner MB, Fritscher CC. Abstinence rates and predictors of outcome for smoking cessation: do Brazilian smokers need special strategies? Addiction 2004;99:778-84.   Back to cited text no. 76    
77.Colrain IM, Trinder J, Swan GE. The impact of smoking cessation on objective and subjective markers of sleep: review, synthesis, and recommendations. Nicotine Tob Res 2004;6:913-25.  Back to cited text no. 77    
78.Haustein KO, Haffner S, Woodcock BG. A review of the pharmacological and psychopharmacological aspects of smoking and smoking cessation in psychiatric patients. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2002;40:404-18.  Back to cited text no. 78    
79.Borrelli B, Bock B, King T, Pinto B, Marcus BH. The impact of depression on smoking cessation in women. Am J Prev Med 1996;12:378-87.  Back to cited text no. 79    
80.Wagena EJ, Zeegers MP, van Schayck CP, Wouters EF. Benefits and risks of pharmacological smoking cessation therapies in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Drug Saf 2003;26:381-403.  Back to cited text no. 80    
81.Nerin I, Novella P, Crucelaegui A, Beamonte A, Sobradiel N, Gargallo P. Predictors of success at 6-month follow-up for smokers treated at a smoking cessation clinic . Arch Bronconeumol 2004;40:558-62.  Back to cited text no. 81    
82.Le Houezec J. Role of nicotine pharmacokinetics in nicotine addiction and nicotine replacement therapy: A review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2003;7: 811-9.  Back to cited text no. 82    
83.Malaiyandi V, Sellers EM, Tyndale RF. Implications of CYP2A6 genetic variation for smoking behaviors and nicotine dependence. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2005;77:145-58.  Back to cited text no. 83    
84.Chengappa KN, Kambhampati RK, Perkins K, Nigam R, Anderson T, Brar JS, et al . Bupropion sustained release as a smoking cessation treatment in remitted depressed patients maintained on treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants. J Clin Psychiatry 2001;62: 503-8.  Back to cited text no. 84    
85.Bergmann L, Warncke W, Herschel M. Bupropion SR for weaning from smoking in relapsed smokers: Results of an open multicentre trial in Germany. Pneumologie 2004;58:140-6.  Back to cited text no. 85    
86.Collins BN, Wileyto EP, Patterson F, Rukstalis M, Audrain-McGovern J, Kaufmann V, et al . Gender differences in smoking cessation in a placebo-controlled trial of bupropion with behavioral counseling. Nicotine Tob Res 2004;6:27-37.  Back to cited text no. 86    
87.Scharf D, Shiffman S. Are there gender differences in smoking cessation, with and without bupropion? Pooled- and meta-analyses of clinical trials of Bupropion SR. Addiction 2004;99:1462-9.  Back to cited text no. 87    
88.Johnstone E, Hey K, Drury M, Roberts S, Welch S, Walton R, et al . Zyban for smoking cessation in a general practice setting: The response to an invitation to make a quit attempt. Addict Biol 2004;9:227-32.  Back to cited text no. 88    
89.Swan GE, McAfee T, Curry SJ, Jack LM, Javitz H, Dacey S, et al . Effectiveness of bupropion sustained release for smoking cessation in a healthcare setting: a randomized trial. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2337-44.  Back to cited text no. 89    
90.Simon JA, Duncan C, Carmody TP, Hudes ES. Bupropion for smoking cessation: A randomized trial. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1797-803.  Back to cited text no. 90    
91.Aubin HJ, Lebargy F, Berlin I, Bidaut-Mazel C, Chemali-Hudry J, Lagrue G. Efficacy of bupropion and predictors of successful outcome in a sample of French smokers: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Addiction 2004;99: 1206-18.  Back to cited text no. 91    
92.Crofter J, Douglas A. Respiratory diseases. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell science; 1983.  Back to cited text no. 92    
93.Kumar S. Newdelhi, India steps up anti tobacco measures. Lancet 2000;336: 920.  Back to cited text no. 93    
94.Gupta PC. Tobacco Products Bill 2001: An aid to public health. Natl Med J 2001;3:131-4.  Back to cited text no. 94    
95.IC Health Workshop on Priorities for Research Relevant to Tobacco Control in Developing Countries. Geneva; 2003.  Back to cited text no. 95    
96.Arcavi L, Benowitz NL. Cigarette smoking and infection. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2206-16.  Back to cited text no. 96    
97.Ferry L, Johnston JA. Efficacy and safety of bupropion SR for smoking cessation: Data from clinical trials and five years of post marketing experience. Int J Clin Pract 2003;57:224-30.  Back to cited text no. 97    
98.Young R, Glennon RA. Nicotine and bupropion share a similar discriminative stimulus effect. Eur J Pharmacol 2002;443:113-8.  Back to cited text no. 98    
99.Hayford KE, Patten CA, Rummans TA, Schroeder DR, Offord KP, Croghan IT, et al . Efficacy of bupropion for smoking cessation in smokers with a former history of major depression or alcoholism. Br J Psychiatry 1999;174: 173-8.  Back to cited text no. 99    
100.Shiffman S, Johnston JA, Khayrallah M, Elash CA, Gwaltney CJ, Paty JA, et al . The effect of bupropion on nicotine craving and withdrawal. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2000;148:33-40.  Back to cited text no. 100    
101.[No authors listed] Amfebutamone/bupropion for smoking cessation: New preparation. Nicotine replacement therapy is safer. Prescrire Int 2001;10: 163-7.  Back to cited text no. 101    
102.Tonstad S. Bupropion as an aid for smoking cessation. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2002;122:2612-5.  Back to cited text no. 102    
103.Noble F. Bupropion: Risks and advantages of its use. What preclinical research says? Ann Med Interne (Paris) 2002;153:237-41.  Back to cited text no. 103    
104.Earles J, Folen RA, Ma M, Kellar M, Geralde R, Dydek C. Clinical effectiveness of sustained-release bupropion and behaviour therapy for tobacco dependence in a clinical setting. Mil Med 2002;167:923-5.  Back to cited text no. 104    
105.Curry SJ, Ludman EJ, McClure J. Self-administered treatment for smoking cessation. J Clin Psychol 2003;59:305-19.  Back to cited text no. 105    
106.Westmaas JL, Brandon TH. Reducing risk in smokers. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2004;10:284-8.  Back to cited text no. 106    


[Table - 1], [Table - 2]


Print this article  Email this article


Site Map | Home | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer | Privacy Notice
Online since 20th July '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow