IPSIndian Journal of Pharmacology
Home  IPS  Feedback Subscribe Top cited articles Login 
Users Online : 3727 
Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Navigate Here
  Search
 
 » Next article
 » Previous article 
 » Table of Contents
  
Resource Links
 »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
 »  Article in PDF (355 KB)
 »  Citation Manager
 »  Access Statistics
 »  Reader Comments
 »  Email Alert *
 »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
In This Article
 »  Abstract
 »  Introduction
 »  Materials and Me...
 »  Results
 »  Discussion
 »  Acknowledgements
 »  References
 »  Article Figures
 »  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed9108    
    Printed253    
    Emailed13    
    PDF Downloaded570    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 8    

Recommend this journal

 


 
RESEARCH PAPER
Year : 2005  |  Volume : 37  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 96-102
 

Pharmacological investigations of Sapindus trifoliatus in various in vitro and in vivo models of inflammation


1 Department of Pharmacology, New Chemical Entity Research, Lupin Research Park, Village Nande, Taluk Mulshi, Pune-411 042 and Department of Pharmacology, Bharati Vidyapeeth, Poona College of Pharmacy, Pune-411 038, India
2 Department of Pharmacology, New Chemical Entity Research, Lupin Research Park, Village Nande, Taluk Mulshi, Pune-411 042, India
3 Department of Pharmacology, Bharati Vidyapeeth, Poona College of Pharmacy, Pune-411 038, India

Date of Submission05-Jul-2004
Date of Decision03-Aug-2004
Date of Acceptance08-Nov-2004

Correspondence Address:
A Veeranjaneyulu
Department of Pharmacology, New Chemical Entity Research, Lupin Research Park, Village Nande, Taluk Mulshi, Pune-411 042
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0253-7613.15109

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of lyophilized aqueous extract of pericarps of Sapindus trifoliatus (ST) in various in vitro and in vivo inflammatory models. METHODS: ST was studied for its in vitro inhibitory activity against 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO), cyclo-oxygenase (COX), leukotriene B4 (LTB4) and nitric oxide synthase (NOS). At doses 20 and 100 mg/kg, i.p. ST was evaluated in acute pedal inflammation induced by carrageenan, histamine, serotonin and zymosan in rats and mice. Further, the effect of topical application of the extract (1 mg and 5 mg) on ear inflammation induced by various inflammatory agents like -O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol 13-acetate (TPA) or capsaicin or arachidonic oxazolone or dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) was also investigated. RESULTS: In vitro evaluation of the extract revealed its inhibitory activity against the major inflammatory mediators 5-LO, COX, LTB4 and NOS. The extract significantly inhibited the pedal inflammation produced by carrageenan, histamine, serotonin and zymosan. Further, topical application of ST significantly inhibited the ear inflammation induced by acute and multiple applications of TPA and acute application of capsaicin or arachidonic acid. However, the extract failed to inhibit ear inflammation induced by oxazolone or DNFB. CONCLUSION: ST has antiinflammatory activity possibly mediated through 5-LO and COX pathways.


Keywords: COX, inflammation, lipoxygenase, leukotriene, nitric oxide synthase


How to cite this article:
Arulmozhi D K, Veeranjaneyulu A, Bodhankar S L, Arora S K. Pharmacological investigations of Sapindus trifoliatus in various in vitro and in vivo models of inflammation . Indian J Pharmacol 2005;37:96-102

How to cite this URL:
Arulmozhi D K, Veeranjaneyulu A, Bodhankar S L, Arora S K. Pharmacological investigations of Sapindus trifoliatus in various in vitro and in vivo models of inflammation . Indian J Pharmacol [serial online] 2005 [cited 2021 Oct 17];37:96-102. Available from: https://www.ijp-online.com/text.asp?2005/37/2/96/15109



 » Introduction Top


Sapindus trifoliatus (ST) is a medium sized deciduous tree growing wild in south India that belongs to the family Sapindaceae. It is known locally as soapnut tree. The plant has been reported for its high content of saponins and sugars. The saponin moiety is characterized as the hederagenin group of glycosides. The pericarp is reported for various medicinal properties. It is regarded as a tonic, stomachic, spermicidal and is used in the treatment of hemicrania (migraine) etc.[1] A thick watery solution of the pericarp is used for the relief of hemicrania, hysteria or epilepsy.[1] However, there has been no published preclinical/clinical report available for its possible antiinflammatory properties.

It is evident from the literature that plants like feverfew (Tanacetum parthenium) and butter bur (Petasites hybridus), which are known for migraine prophylaxis[2] exhibited antinociceptive and antiinflammatory effects[3],[4] in animal models of pain and inflammation. Since Sapindus trifoliatus (as intranasal application) has been quoted for its use in hemicrania (migraine pain) in traditional folk medicine [1] and has recently been reported for its antinociceptive [5] and antimigraine activity,[6] the objective of the present study was to investigate its possible antiinflammatory effect in both in vitro and in vivo experimental models of inflammation.


 » Materials and Methods Top


Drugs and chemicals

Arachidonic acid (AA), carrageenan, serotonin, histamine, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate (TPA), 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB), 4-ethoxymethylene-2-phenyl-2-oxazoline-5-one (oxazolone), indomethacin, zymosan A (from Saccharomyces cervisiae) and dexamethasone were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co (ST. Louis, USA). 1-phenyl-3 pyrazolidinone (phenidone) was from Aldrich, Germany. 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO, human recombinant, specific activity ~ 20 units/mg) was purchased from Caymen Chemicals, Ann Arbor, USA. BWB70C and capsaicin were procured from Tocris, Avonmouth, UK. All other chemicals and reagents were of pure analytical grade and obtained from local suppliers.

Plant material and extraction procedure

The dried pericarps of the fruits of Sapindus trifoliatus Linn, family Sapindaceae were collected from the local market and were authenticated by Dr. A. M. Mujumdar, Agharkar Research Institute, Pune, India. Aqueous extract of ST was prepared as reported.[5],[6] Briefly, one hundred grams of the pericarp was soaked in 400 ml of distilled water for 16 h. The percolate was then decanted, centrifuged and filtered through Whatman (No.1) filter paper to obtain clear extract (300 ml). This process of extraction was repeated again with the same volume of distilled water. The percolates were pooled and lyophilized which yielded a brown colored powder (68% yield). Acid hydrolysis of the extract yielded only one glycone, which was identified as hederagenin. Therefore, estimation of the saponins present in the extract was calculated as hederagenin. The content of hederagenin was estimated in the extract by boiling it with 50% methanolic hydrochloric acid. The entire mixture was evaporated to dryness and reconstituted in methanol. HPLC estimation was carried out using Kromasil C-18 column (5 µm, 250 x 4.6 mm) with gradient elution (0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile in the ratio of 80:20 v/v) and evaporative light scattering detector. The concentration of hederagenin was found to be between 5.61-6.97 % by weight of the extract.

Animals

Adult male Swiss albino mice (18-22 g) and Wistar rats (180-220 g) were obtained from the Research Animal Facility of Poona College of Pharmacy (PCP), Pune, India. On arrival, the animals were placed at random and allocated to treatment groups in polypropylene cages with paddy husk as bedding. Animals were housed at a temperature of 24+2 oC and relative humidity of 30-70%. A 12:12 light:dark cycle was followed. All animals had free access to water filtered through Aquaguard ® and standard pelleted laboratory animal diet. All the experimental procedures and protocols used in this study were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of PCP, Pune, India and were in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA), Ministry Forests and Environment, Government of India. Rules of CPCSEA are laid down as per ILAR (Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, USA) guidelines.

In vitro assays

5-lipoxygenase assays

For the evaluation of 5-LO inhibitory activity, the enzymatic activity of 5-LO was measured spectrophotometrically using human recombinant 5-LO and an incubation mixture containing 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 12 µg/ml phosphatidyl choline, 0.2 mM ATP, 0.2 mM CaCl2 and 20 µM AA. Different concentrations of ST (dissolved in Milli Q water) or 1 µM of BWB70C, a specific 5-LO inhibitor (dissolved in 10% Dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO], 0.1% final concentration) were added to the reaction mixture. The reaction was initiated by the addition of an aliquot enzyme (25 units), and the rate of conjugated diene formation was followed at room temperature for 2 min. Enzymatic activity was calculated from the highest linear rate of the diene formation at absorbance 234 nm and percentage inhibition was calculated relative to a control reaction containing Milli Q water or DMSO vehicle.[7],[8]

Other in vitro assays

The enzyme inhibition assays for cyclo-oxygenases (COX -1 and COX -2), leukotriene B4 (LTB4), nitric oxide synthase (NOS) were carried out by NovaScreen Biosciences Corporation, USA. The studies were done as per the standard protocols found elsewhere [9] (www.novascreen.com). The details of the receptor source, ligands and reference compounds used are listed in [Table - 1].

In vivo assays

Dose response study of ST with the range of doses of 10, 20, 40, 80, 100 and 160 mg/kg, was carried out and the minimal effective dose of ST to cause effect was found to be 20 mg/kg, i.p. There was no incremental dose-related response with 40 and 80 mg/kg. However at 100 mg/kg, i.p the response was maximal. This could be attributed to the nature of the extract. Hence only two doses 20 and 100 mg/kg, i.p were employed throughout the in vivo experiments.

Carrageenan, histamine or serotonin-induced rat pedal inflammation

Pedal inflammation in rat was produced according to the method of Winter et al,[10] Olajide et al [11] and Kaur et al.[12] Rats were treated intraperitoneally with ST (20 and 100 mg/kg) or indomethacin (20 mg/kg) or saline (10 ml/kg). Fifteen minutes after the treatment, rats were injected with 0.1 ml of carrageenan or histamine or serotonin (all 1% solution in saline) into the right hind paw under the subplantar tissue. Paw volume measurements were carried out immediately before and various time points after phlogistic agent injection using a plethysmometer (Ugo Basile 7140).

Zymosan A-induced mouse paw inflammation

The method of Rouleau et al [13] was followed with minor modifications. Inflammation was induced in mice by subplantar injection of 25 µl of 2% zymosan A suspension in saline into the left hind paw. The animals were killed 4 h later and the hind paws were cut off at the ankle and weighed in an analytical balance. ST (20 or 100 mg/kg, i.p.) or indomethacin (20 mg/kg, i.p.) or saline was injected 15 min prior to zymosan injection.

Acute single application of tetradecanoylphorbol acetate (TPA)-induced mouse ear inflammation

The method of Recio et al [14] was followed. Inflammation was induced on the right ear by topical application of 20 µl of TPA in acetone (2.5 µg/ear) with a micropipette. Ear thickness was measured before and 4 h after induction of inflammation using a micrometer (Mitutoyo, Japan). ST was dissolved in 80% acetone and applied topically (1 and 5 mg/ear in 20µl) simultaneously with TPA. The standard drug indomethacin was administered at a dose of 0.5 mg/ear. The effect of the extract on inflammation was expressed as per cent inhibition from the mice treated with 80% acetone.

Mouse ear inflammation-induced by multiple topical applications of TPA

The method of Stanley et al [16] was followed. Chronic inflammation was induced by topical application of 20 µl of TPA (2 µg/ear x 5 times) to both the inner and outer surface of both the ears of each mouse with a micropipette on alternate days. ST (1 and 5 mg/ear) or dexamethasone (0.05 mg/ear) was applied topically twice daily for four days in the morning immediately after TPA application and 6 h later. The ear thickness was measured 4 h after the last TPA application.

Capsaicin-induced mouse ear inflammation

The method of Martione and Rodriguez [15] was followed with minor modifications. Inflammation was induced on the right ear by topical application of 20 µl of capsaicin in acetone (100 µg/ear) with a micropipette. Ear thickness was measured before and 1 h after induction of inflammation using a micrometer (Mitutoyo, Japan). ST was dissolved in 80% acetone and applied topically (1 and 5 mg/ear in 20 µl) 15 min prior to capsaicin application. The standard drug indomethacin was administered at a dose of 0.5 mg/ear. The effect of the extract on inflammation was expressed as per cent inhibition from the mice treated with 80% acetone.

Arachidonic acid (AA)-induced mouse ear inflammation

The method of Giner et al [17] was followed. ST (1 and 5 mg/ear in 20 µl) dissolved in 80% acetone was applied 30 min before the application of AA (2 mg in 20 µl) in the right ear. Thickness of the ears was measured before and 1 h after the induction of inflammation using the micrometer. A reference group was treated with phenidone (1 mg/ear).

Oxazolone or dinitroflurobenzene (DNFB)-induced mouse ear inflammation

Mice were sensitized by topical applications on the shaven ventral abdomen of 50 µl of 2% solution of oxazolone in acetone or 0.2% (v/v) solution of DNFB in olive oil and acetone mixture (1:4) on two consecutive days. Challenge was performed on Day 6 by application of either 30 µl of 2% oxazolone or 0.2% DNFB. ST (1 and 5 mg/ear in 20 µl) or dexamethasone (0.5 mg/ear) was applied 30 min before the challenge. Ear thickness was measured 24 h after the challenge.[18],[19]

Statistical analysis

Inflammations are expressed as mean+SEM. The inhibition percentages are calculated from the differences between the treated and control groups. Statistical significance of differences between the mean values was analyzed by ANOVA and Dunnett′s test. A P value of < 0.05 was considered to be significant.


 » Results Top


5-LO assays

ST (50-400 µg/ml) caused a concentration -dependent inhibition of the human recombinant 5-LO. At the concentration of 400 µg/ml the inhibitory effect (49.37% inhibition) was found to be statistically significant (P< 0.05). The specific 5-LO inhi-bitor BW B 70C exhibited 48.13% inhibition at 1µM [Figure - 1].

Other in vitro assays

The percent inhibition exhibited by ST (at 250 µg/ml) on COX -1, COX - 2, NOS (constitutive-neuronal) and LTD4 are listed in [Table - 1].

Carrageenan, histamine, serotonin or zymosan A-induced paw inflammation

Intraplantar injection in the hind paw with carrageenan induced a progressive inflammation reaching a maximum at 3 h. Animals treated intraperitoneally with aqueous extract of ST at doses 20 and 100 mg showed a significant inhibition of inflammation in all phases of the experiment. The antiinflammatory effect at the 100 mg dose was comparable to that of indomethacin (20 mg/kg, i.p) [Figure - 2].

At the lower dose (20 mg/kg, i.p.) ST extract did not exhibit significant inhibition of paw inflammation induced by intraplantar injection of histamine or serotonin or zymosan A. However, at 100 mg dose ST significantly inhibited the pedal inflammation caused by histamine or serotonin or zymosan A, which was similar to that of indomethacin (20 mg/kg, i.p.) [Figure - 3], [Figure - 4], [Figure - 5]

TPA-induced acute mouse ear inflammation

Topical application of aqueous extract of ST inhibited the TPA-induced acute mouse ear inflammation by 37.31% and 52.08 % at doses 1 and 5 mg/ear respectively. The reference drug indomethacin (0.5 mg/ear) exhibited 59.90% inhibition in this inflammatory model [Table - 2].

Capsaicin-induced acute mouse ear inflammation

Topical application of aqueous extract of ST significantly (P< 0.001) inhibited the capsaicin-induced acute mouse ear inflammation by 26.13% and 41.15 % at doses 1 and 5 mg/ear respectively. The antiinflammatogenic effect exhibited by ST was comparable to that of reference drug indomethacin (0.5 mg/ear, 42.39% inhibition) in capsaicin-induced mouse ear inflammation [Table - 2].

Arachidonic acid (AA)-induced mouse ear inflammation

Administration of AA to mouse produced a short inflammatory response. Topical application of ST extract showed a significant (P< 0.001) inhibition of AA-induced ear inflammation at doses 1 mg/ear (25.44% inhibition) and 5 mg/ear (40.40% inhibition) [Table - 2].

Mouse ear inflammation induced by multiple topical application of TPA

ST at 1 mg/ear did not exhibit a significant inflammation reduction in prolonged inflammation induced by multiple applications of TPA to mouse ear. However, at the 5 mg/ear dose the extract showed mild antiinflammatogenic effect on TPA-induced chronic mouse ear inflammation. The glucocorticoid dexamethasone (0.05 mg/ear) exhibited a statistically significant (P< 0.05) reduction of inflammation [Table - 2].

Oxazolone and DNFB-induced contact-delayed type hypersensitivity mouse ear inflammation

ST failed to show any significant effect on oxazolone and DNFB-induced mouse ear swelling at 1 mg/ear dose. At 5 mg/ear dose a mild antiinflammatogenic effect was observed (8.59% inhibition in oxazolone and 10.23% inhibition in DNFB) [Table - 2].


 » Discussion Top


The present study established the antiinflammatory activity of the aqueous extract of ST. The extract produced marked inhibition of carrageenan-induced rat paw inflammation, a test which has a significant predictive value for antiinflammatory agents acting by inhibiting the mediators of acute inflammation.[11] Also, carrageenan-induced paw inflammation is a test largely used to study both steroidal and non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Carrageenan induces an inflammatory reaction in two different phases. The initial phase, which occurs between 0 and 2 h after injection of carrageenan, has been attributed to the release of histamine, serotonin and bradykinin on vascular permeability.[20] The inflammation volume reaches its maximum approximately 3 h post-treatment after which it begins to decline.[21] The late phase, which is also a complement-dependent reaction, has been shown to be due to overproduction of prostaglandin in tissues.[22] ST extract inhibited the inflammation from the first hour, acting on both the early as well the late phases. ST extract also effectively inhibited the inflammation produced by histamine and serotonin, which suggests that the antiinflammatory activity of ST is possibly mediated by inhibiting the action of these mediators. In addition to these mediators, NO also plays an important role in carrageenan-induced paw inflammation.[23] Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression and subsequent production of NO maintains the inflammation. In radio-ligand binding studies, at a concentration of 250 µg/ml ST has an 84.10% inhibition of NOS (constitutive neuronal) [Table - 1], which may support to the present in vivo findings.

Zymosan, an insoluble fraction of yeast cell wall produces an inflammatory response through multiple factors which include generation of anaphylotoxins that induce histamine release from mast cells, biosynthesis of eicosanoids by neutrophil macrophages and generation and release of platelet-activating factors, oxygen free radicals and lysosomal enzymes.[24],[25] ST at 100 mg/kg dose significantly inhibited the zymosan-induced paw inflammation in mice, suggesting that ST could involve inhibition of one or more of the above mentioned inflammatory mediators.

Topical application of TPA offers a model of skin inflammation appropriate for evaluating antiinflammatory agents. TPA produces inflammation by activating phospholipase A2 (PLA2) which subsequently activates the release and metabolism of AA. The COX and 5-LO inhibitors are very effective in suppressing TPA-induced ear inflammation indicating the role of prostaglandins and leukotrienes respectively.[14] Topical application of ST extract significantly inhibited TPA-induced acute ear inflammation. In vitro inhibition of COX [Table - 1] and 5-LO [Figure - 1] by ST could be corroborated with the results of the in vivo acute inflammatory model.

It is reported that, capsaicin-like molecules affect C-fiber thin primary afferent neurons that are connected to distinct sensory receptors.[26] Stimulation of sensory nerves in the skin causes an inflammatory reaction comprising arteriolar dilatation, increase in vascular permeability and recruitment of leukocytes.[27] This neurogenic inflammation arises from the release of vasoactive peptide transmitters such as substance P (SP) and calcitonin-gene related peptide (CGRP) from the peripheral endings of the afferent nerve fibers.[28] It is possible that the antiinflammatory effect of ST observed in this model could be related to inhibition of the above peptide mediators.

According to Young et al,[29] AA provokes a rapid intense inflammatory response in the mouse ear inflammation that is affected by lipoxygenase inhibitors, and the COX inhibitors are generally not active in this model. Effect of ST on AA-induced ear inflammation could be correlated with its 5-LO inhibitory activity observed in vitro [Figure - 1].

Repeated application of TPA causes a measurable increase in the ear skin mastocyte population.[17] Although glucocorticoids are the most active drugs against the chronic inflammation caused by repeated application of TPA, other pharmacological agents have also been found to be effective, e.g. 5-LO inhibitors.[16] We thus propose that the mild inhibition by ST could be due to its combined inhibition of 5-LO, LTB4 and COX.

Topical oxazolone or DNFB-induced delayed type hypersensitivity (mouse ear inflammation test) is applied as a tool to discover new drugs that could inhibit the inflammation and tissue destruction. It has been reported that non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs are fairly inactive in this model.[18] No potential inhibitory effect of ST was observed in the above models of chronic inflammation.

In conclusion, ST a phytomedicine traditionally used in the treatment of hemicrania (a neurovascular disorder due to neurogenic inflammation and vasoactive peptides) exhibited antiinflammatory activity in various in vitro and in vivo models of inflammation. These results suggest that cyclo-oxygenase and lipoxygenase pathways could be involved in the antiinflammatory activity of ST like feverfew, a well-known prophylactic antimigraine herb.[30] Saponins, particularly the hederagenin type are known to have antiinflammatory, antinociceptive and antirheumatic activities.[31],[32],[33] It is therefore probable that the saponin component of the extract may contribute in part for the observed pharmacological activities.


 » Acknowledgements Top


The authors wish to thank Dr. V. Srivastava & Mr. S. K. Joshi for their help in the extraction procedure and Dr. N. Sridhar for valuable suggestions in the preparation of the manuscript. We hereby acknowledge NovaScreen Biosciences Corporation, USA for conducting radio-ligand binding studies.

 
 » References Top

1.Kritikar KR, Basu BD. Indian medicinal plants. Vol. 1. New Delhi: International Book Distributors; 1999.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Johnson ES, Kadam NP, Hylands DM, Hylands PJ. Efficacy of feverfew as prophylactic treatment of migraine. Br Med J 1985; 291:569-73.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  
3.Jain NK, Kulkarni SK. Antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects of Tanacetum parthenium L. extract in mice and rats. J Ethnopharmacol 1999;68: 251-9.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  
4.Grossman W, Schmidramsl H. An extract of Petasites hybridus is effective in the prophylaxis of migraine. Altern Med Rev 2001;6:303-10.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
5.Arulmozhi DK, Veeranjaneyulu A, Bodhankar SL, Arora SK. Investigations into the antinociceptive activity of Sapindus trifoliatus in various pain models. J Pharm Pharmacol 2004;56:655-61.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
6.Arulmozhi DK, Sridhar N, Bodhankar SL, Veeranjaneyulu A, Arora SK. In vitro pharmacological investigations of Sapindus trifoliatus in various migraine targets. J Ethnopharmacol 2004;95:239-45.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
7.Falgueyret JP, Denis D, Macdonald D, Hutchinson JH, Riendeau D. Characterization of the arachidonate and ATP binding sites of human 5-lipoxygenase using photoaffinity labeling and enzyme immobilization. Biochemistry 1995;34:13603-11.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  
8.Ulusu NN, Ercil D, Sakar MK, Tezcan EF. Abietic acid inhibits lipoxygenase activity. Phytother Res 2002;16:88-90.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
9.Bylund DB, Toews ML. Radioligand binding methods: Practical guide and tips. Am J Physiol 1993;265:421-9.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Winter CA, Risley EA, Nuss GW. Carrageenan-induced inflammation in hind paw of the rat as an assay for anti-inflammatory drugs. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1962;111:544-7.  Back to cited text no. 10  [PUBMED]  
11.Olajide OA, Makinde JM, Awe SO. Effects of the aqueous extract of Bridelia ferruginea stem bark on carrageenan-induced oedema and granuloma tissue formation in rats and mice. J Ethnopharmacol 1999;66:113-7.  Back to cited text no. 11  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
12.Kaur G, Hamid H, Ali A, Alam MS, Athar M. Anti-inflammatory evaluation of alcoholic extract of galls of Quercus infectoria. J Ethnopharmacol 2004;90:285-92.  Back to cited text no. 12  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
13.Rouleau A, Garbarg M, Linneau X, Mantion C, Lavie P, Advenier C, et al. Bioavailability, antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory properties of BP2-94, a histamine H3 receptor agonist prodrug. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997;281:1085-94.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Recio MC, Giner RM, Uriburu L, Manez S, Cerda M, De la Fuente JR, et al. In vivo activity of pseudoguaianolide sesquiterpene lactones in acute and chronic inflammation. Life Sci 2000;66:2509-18.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Mantione CR, Rodriguez R. A bradykinin (BK)1 receptor antagonist blocks capsaicin-induced ear inflammation in mice. Br J Pharmacol 1990;99:516-8.  Back to cited text no. 15  [PUBMED]  
16.Stanley PL, Steiner S, Havens M, Tramposch KM. Mouse skin inflammation induced by topical applications of 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate. Skin Pharmacol 1991;4:262-71.  Back to cited text no. 16  [PUBMED]  
17.Giner EM, Manez S, Recio MC, Giner RM, Nicholas CM, Rios JL. In vivo studies on the anti-inflammatory activity of pachymic and dehydrotumulosic acids. Planta Med 2000;66:221-7.  Back to cited text no. 17    
18.Gongora L, Giner RM, Manez S, Mdel RC, Rios JL. Phagualon rupestre as a source of compounds active on contact hypersensitivity. Planta Med 2002; 68:561-4.  Back to cited text no. 18    
19.De Leon EJ, Olmedo DA, Solis PN, Gupta MP, Terencio MC. Diayangambin exerts immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory effects in vitro and in vivo. Planta Med 2002;68:1128-31.  Back to cited text no. 19  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
20.Vineger R, Truax JF, Selph JL, Jonhston PR, Venable AL, McKenzie RK. Pathway to carrageenan-induced inflammation in the hind limb of the rat. Fed Proc 1987;46:118-26.  Back to cited text no. 20    
21.Garcia MD, Fernandez MA, Alvarez A, Saenz MT. Antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effect of the aqueous extract from leaves of Pimenta racemosa var ozua (Mirtaceae). J Ethnopharmacol 2004;91:69-73.  Back to cited text no. 21  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
22.Di Rosa M. Effects of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on leukocyte migration. In: Future Trends in Inflammation. Velo GP, Willoughby PA, editors. Padova: Piccin Medical Books; 1974.  Back to cited text no. 22    
23.Salvemini D, Wang ZQ, Wyatt PS, Bourdon DM, Marino MH, Manning PT, et al. Nitric oxide: A key mediator in the early and late phase of carrageenan induced rat paw inflammation. Br J Pharmacol 1996;18:829-38.  Back to cited text no. 23    
24.Doherty NS, Poubelle P, Borgeat P, Beaver TH, Westrich GL, Schrader NL. Intraperitoneal injection of zymosan in mice induces pain, inflammation and synthesis of peptidoleukotrienes and prostaglandin E2. Prostaglandins 1985;30:769-89.  Back to cited text no. 24  [PUBMED]  
25.Rao TS, Currie JL, Shaffer AF, Isakson PC. In vivo characterization of zymosan induced mouse peritoneal inflammation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1994;269:917-25.  Back to cited text no. 25  [PUBMED]  
26.Holzer P. Capsaicin: cellular targets, mechanism of action and selectivity for thin sensory neurons. Phamacol Rev 1991;43:143-201.  Back to cited text no. 26    
27.Lynn B. Neurogenic inflammation. Skin Pharmacol 1988;1:217-24.  Back to cited text no. 27  [PUBMED]  
28.Hughes SR, Brain SD. A calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonist (CGRP8-37) inhibits mircrovascular responses induced by CGRP and capsaicin in skin. Br J Pharmacol 1991; 104:738-42.  Back to cited text no. 28  [PUBMED]  
29.Young JM, Spires DA, Bedord CJ, Wagner B, Ballaron SJ, De Young LM. The mouse ear inflammatory response to topical arachidonic acid. J Invest Dermatol 1984; 82:367-71.  Back to cited text no. 29  [PUBMED]  
30.Sumner H, Salan U, Knight DW, Hoult JR. Inhibition of 5-lipoxygenase and cyclo-oxygenase in leukocytes by feverfew. Involvement of sesquiterpene lactones and other components. Biochem Pharmacol 1992;43:2313-20.  Back to cited text no. 30  [PUBMED]  
31.Takagi K, Park EH, Kato H. Anti-inflammatory activities of hederagenin and crude saponin isolated from Sapindus mukrossi Garten. Chem Pharm Bull 1980;28:1183-8.  Back to cited text no. 31  [PUBMED]  
32.Suh H, Song D, Huh S, Son K, Kim Y. Antinociceptive mechanisms of dipsacus saponin C administered intrathecally in mice. J Ethnopharmacol 2000; 71:211-8.  Back to cited text no. 32  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
33.Choi J, Huh K, Kim SH, Lee KT, Park HJ, Han YN. Antinociceptive and antirheumatoidal effects of Kalopanax pictus extract and its saponin components in experimental animals. J Ethnopharmacol 2002;79:199-204.  Back to cited text no. 33  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]


Figures

[Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3], [Figure - 4], [Figure - 5]

Tables

[Table - 1], [Table - 2]

This article has been cited by
1 Anti-inflammatory and antioxidative effects of the methanolic extract of the aerial parts ofMitracarpus frigidusin established animal models
Rodrigo Luiz Fabri,Roberta Alvim Garcia,Jônatas Rodrigues Florêncio,Nícolas de Castro Campos Pinto,Luiz Gustavo de Oliveira,Jair Adriano Kopke Aguiar,Antônia Ribeiro,Elita Scio
Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2014; : n/a
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Pentacyclic triterpenoids from Mitracarpus frigidus (Willd. ex Roem. & Schult.) K. Shum: in vitro cytotoxic and leishmanicidal and in vivo anti-inflammatory and antioxidative activities
Rodrigo Luiz Fabri,Roberta Alvim Garcia,Jônatas Rodrigues Florêncio,Lidiane Oliveira de Carvalho,Nícolas de Castro Campos Pinto,Elaine Soares Coimbra,Elaine Maria de Souza-Fagundes,Antônia Ribeiro,Elita Scio
Medicinal Chemistry Research. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities of red seaweed Dichotomaria obtusata
Vázquez, A.I.F., Sánchez, C.M.D., Delgado, N.G., Alfonso, A.M.S., Ortega, Y.S., Sánchez, H.C.
Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2011; 47(1): 111-118
[Pubmed]
4 Free radical scavenging potential of some Indian medicinal plants
Kumar, A., Kaur, R., Arora, S.
Journal of Medicinal Plant Research. 2010; 4(19): 2034-2042
[Pubmed]
5 Biological activity and isolated compounds in Sapindus saponaria L. and other plants of the genus Sapindus
Pelegrini, D.D., Tsuzuki, J.K., Amado, C.A.B., Cortez, D.A.G., Ferreira, I.C.P.
Latin American Journal of Pharmacy. 2008; 27(6): 922-927
[Pubmed]
6 Anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive activity of arbortristoside-A
Das, S., Sasmal, D., Basu, S.P.
Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2008; 116(1): 198-203
[Pubmed]
7 Anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive activity of arbortristoside-A
Dinakar Sasmal, Saumya Priya Basu, Sanjita Das
Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2008; 116(1): 198
[VIEW] | [DOI]
8 Antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory activity of various extracts of Sesbania sesban (L.) Merr. leaves
Tatiya, A.U., Nikam, D.D., Surana, S.J.
Indian Drugs. 2007; 44(10): 778-783
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article

    

Site Map | Home | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer
Online since 20th July '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow