IPSIndian Journal of Pharmacology
Home  IPS  Feedback Subscribe Top cited articles Login 
Users Online : 1191 
Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Navigate Here
  Search
 
  Next article
  Previous article 
  Table of Contents
  
Resource Links
   Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
   Article in PDF (40 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
In This Article

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3375    
    Printed136    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded104    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 
BOOK REVIEW
Year : 2004  |  Volume : 36  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 368
 

Book Review


Head of the Department, Department of Pharmacology, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India

Correspondence Address:
Head of the Department, Department of Pharmacology, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India
[email protected]



How to cite this article:
Shashindran C H. Book Review. Indian J Pharmacol 2004;36:368


How to cite this URL:
Shashindran C H. Book Review. Indian J Pharmacol [serial online] 2004 [cited 2021 Jul 28];36:368. Available from: https://www.ijp-online.com/text.asp?2004/36/6/368/13508


MCQ's IN PHARMACOLOGY with brief explanatory note for correct answer by Chandrakanta Chouhan. Published by AITBS Publishers & Distributors (Regd.), Delhi, India. First Edition, 2004. ISBN 81-7473-253-5. Pages 306. (Price: Rs. 150/-).

This book as the author claims in the preface is meant for MBBS and BDS students. The author says that she has tried to meet the recommendations of the Medical Council of India by emphasizing the area of rational therapeutics. One very important feature of this book is that after each chapter there is an explanatory note as to why a particular option is the right answer to an item. While the students may find it helpful in satisfying their curiosity, it is no substitute for going through the standard text books for meaningful learning and the development of critical reasoning. The book as a whole is laudable attempt at bringing out a collection of MCQ's. However there have been several pitfalls in the construction and format of several items. To cite a few, in several of the items the stem does not go grammatically with the options. Several of the items have clues. MCQs as we know is an instrument for measuring knowledge. However, the presence of clues in the items tend to bring down validity of the instrument and helps the not so well prepared learners in guessing the correct option. Certain items have distracters which are not plausible thereby decreasing the efficacy. A distracter to be termed effective should attract at least 5% of the examinees. Non-plausible distracters are unlikely to achieve this. It is hoped that the author will take steps to avoid these shortcomings in the 2nd edition of this otherwise very useful book meant for undergraduate medical students. 

Top
Print this article  Email this article

    

Site Map | Home | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer
Online since 20th July '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow